Perry v. Jo-Ann Stores, LLC
ORDER Overruling 43 Objection to Offer of Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Civil Case No. 15-11748
Jo Ann Stores, Inc.,
Sean F. Cox
United States District Court Judge
OBJECTIONS TO RULE 68 OFFER OF JUDGMENT
This civil case was originally assigned to the Honorable Robert H. Cleland, but was
recently reassigned to the undersigned for trial. (See Docket Entry No. 53).
In an Order issued on August 9, 2016, Judge Cleland ordered that the trial and jury
selection in this action would commence on October 18, 2016. (Docket Entry No. 24).
On October 4, 2016, Defense Counsel filed and served a “Rule 68 Offer of Judgment,”
stating that Defendant offers “to allow judgment to be entered against it in the amount of FiftyThousand ($50,000), including costs and attorneys’ fees.” (Docket Entry No. 42).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]t least 14 days
before the date set for trial, a party defending against a claim may serve on an opposing party an
offer to allow judgment on specified terms, with the costs then accrued.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 68(a)
Here, the date set for trial was October 18, 2016. (Docket Entry No. 24). Pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, when the period of time is stated in days, as is the case with Rule 68, you
count days, not hours. Defendant served the Offer of Judgment on October 4, 2016 – which was
14 days prior to the scheduled trial date. The fact that Plaintiff’s Counsel may have not reviewed
the Offer of Judgment until the morning of October 5, 2016, does not render it untimely.
The Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s Objections to Defendant’s Rule 68 Offer of
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: October 17, 2016
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on
October 17, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?