Drake v. Social Security, Commisioner of

Filing 19

ORDER Adopting 18 Report and Recommendation Denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Maurice Odell Drake, Granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MAURICE ODELL DRAKE, Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11800 v. Paul D. Borman United States District Judge COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, R. Steven Whalen United States Magistrate Judge Defendant. ______________________________/ ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN’S MAY 31, 2016 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 18), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 16), (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 17), AND (4) AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER On May 31, 2016 Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation to deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the findings of the Commissioner. (ECF No. 18, Report and Recommendation.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16), GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17), and AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 30, 2016 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on June 30, 2016. s/Deborah Tofil Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?