Skinner v. Social Security

Filing 16

ORDER Adopting 15 Report and Recommendation, Denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Catherine Ann Skinner, and Granting 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CATHERINE ANN SKINNER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-12368 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, David R. Grand United States Magistrate Judge Defendant. _______________________/ ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 15); (2) GRANTING THE COMMISSIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 12); (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 11); and (4) AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER On December 16, 2016, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) in this action challenging the Commissioner’s final decision to deny Plaintiff’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits. (ECF No. 15, Report and Recommendation.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11), GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12), and AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: January 19, 2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on January 19, 2017. s/Deborah Tofil Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?