Jones v. Wayne County Jail

Filing 31

ORDER Vacating Order to Show Cause 27 and rejecting Report and Recommendation 25 Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

SAMUEL R. JONES
Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 15-12527
HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

v.
WAYNE COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (DOC. 27)
AND REJECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 25)
The instant action is a civil rights case against the Wayne County Jail and
several employees of the Wayne County Jail and/or Sheriff. When Plaintiff filed his
complaint, Plaintiff was an inmate at the Wayne County Jail. Several documents mailed
by the Court to Plaintiff at his Wayne County Jail address were returned as
undeliverable. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford issued a report and
recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the instant action be dismissed for failure
to prosecute. (Doc. 25). As the Magistrate Judge explained in her R&R, the Court had
given Plaintiff repeated notice that it was his obligation to notify the Court if his address
were to change, yet Plaintiff had apparently failed to do so. (See Docs. 2, 23).
The Court reviewed Plaintiff’s incarceration records and determined that Plaintiff
had probably been transferred to the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”).
Although it was clearly Plaintiff’s responsibility to inform the Court of his address
change, the Court nonetheless concluded that it was appropriate to give Plaintiff one
-1-

more chance to explain his failure to prosecute. Accordingly, the Court took the
Magistrate Judge’s R&R under advisement and issued an order to show cause why the
instant action should not be dismissed. (Doc. 27). This order was mailed to Plaintiff at
what was believed to be Plaintiff’s new address at the MDOC’s St. Louis Correctional
Facility.
Plaintiff subsequently filed a “motion showing cause for a summary judgment by
default.” (Doc. 30). Plaintiff spends much of the “motion” providing further arguments in
support of his previously filed motion for summary judgment. (See Doc. 13). In light of
Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court will charitably interpret Plaintiff’s “motion” as a
response to the show-cause order. In the “motion,” Plaintiff explains that he has been
temporarily transferred to the St. Louis Correctional Facility. The Court finds that
Plaintiff has adequately explained his previously failure to prosecute. Moreover, the
Court finds that dismissal would be inappropriate, in light of the factors for dismissal for
failure to prosecute set forth in Knoll v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 176
F.3d 359, 363 (6th Cir. 1999). Most significantly, there is no indication that Plaintiff has
acted wilfully or in bad faith, and there is no indication that the defendants have been
prejudiced by Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.
Accordingly, the Court VACATES its order to show cause (Doc. 27).
Furthermore, the Court REJECTS the R&R (Doc. 25). Plaintiff’s complaint SHALL NOT
be dismissed for failure to prosecute at this time. Furthermore, Plaintiff’s address
SHALL be updated to
Samuel R. Jones
MDOC# 364868
St. Louis Correctional Facility
-2-

8585 N. Croswell Road
St. Louis, MI 48880
The Court reiterates, however, that it is Plaintiff’s responsibility to notify the Court
IMMEDIATELY of any address changes, even if the changes are only temporary. The
Court WILL NOT EXCUSE any more failures by Plaintiff to notify the Court of address
changes.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 13, 2016
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
July 13, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on
Samuel R. Jones #364868, St. Louis Correctional Facility,
8585 N. Croswell Road, St. Louis, MI 48880.
s/Barbara Radke
Deputy Clerk

-3-