Jones v. Wayne County Jail

Filing 39

ORDER accepting 33 Report and Recommendation and denying 13 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment by default. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SAMUEL R. JONES, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 15-12527 HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH v. WAYNE COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 33) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT (DOC. 13) Plaintiff filed the instant civil rights action against the Wayne County Jail and seven employees of the Wayne County Jail and/or Sheriff. The Court dismissed the claims against the Wayne County Jail and three of the individual defendants, leaving only four individual defendants. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Summary Judgment by Default Under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule [sic] 58.” (Doc. 13). In his motion, Plaintiff argues that the defendants defaulted by failing to file an answer to his complaint.1 The four remaining defendants were not served with the complaint until approximately two months after Plaintiff filed his motion. (See Docs. 15, 16, 17, 18) Each of these defendants has since filed an answer. (See Docs. 19, 35). The Court referred Plaintiff’s motion to 1 Plaintiff’s motion is not entirely clear. Alternatively, Plaintiff could be arguing that defendants defaulted by failing to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s order granting Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint. (See Doc. 10). -1- Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Stafford for a report and recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 33). In her R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff has not objected to the R&R. The R&R specifically stated that any objections must be filed within fourteen days of service of the R&R. Moreover, the R&R specifically stated that a failure to file objections would constitute a waiver of any further right to appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); Cowherd v. Million, 380 F.3d 909, 912 (6th Cir. 2004). Finding the R&R to be well-reasoned, the Court hereby ACCEPTS the result recommended therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment by Default (Doc. 13) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 15, 2016 s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on August 15, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on Samuel R. Jones #364868, St. Louis Correctional Facility, 8585 N. Croswell Road, St. Louis, MI 48880. s/Barbara Radke Deputy Clerk -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?