Dorman v. Clinton, Township of

Filing 94

ORDER on Motion Hearing. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL DORMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

Case No. 15-cv-12552
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman

v.
TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON
Defendant.
__________________________________________________________________/
ORDER ON MOTION HEARING
On May 29, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the parties’ cross-motions for
summary judgment. (See Motions, ECF ## 79, 81.) For the reasons stated on the
record at the motion hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
 Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment with respect to Count II of
their First Amended Complaint (Plaintiffs’ “Facial Equal Terms”
claim) is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT;
 Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment with respect to Count III of
their First Amended Complaint (Plaintiffs’ “non-discrimination” claim)
is DENIED;
 Defendant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Count V of
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Plaintiffs’ “appeal from agency
action” claim) is GRANTED; and
1

 Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in all other respects is
DENIED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 29, 2019
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on May 29, 2019, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
[phone]

2