McCallum et al v. Geelhood et al

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING (UNOPPOSED) Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Compel--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTHONY MCCALLUM, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:15-CV-12676 District Judge Denise Page Hood Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti v. STEPHEN GEELHOOD, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (DE 12) Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel discovery on December 10, 2015. (DE 12.) Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1, if Defendants wished to oppose the motion, they had fourteen days in which to file a response, thereby making their response due on December 25, 2015, a legal holiday. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(c) and (e)(2). Defendants’ response was therefore due on or before December 28, 2015, the next day that was not a weekend or legal holiday. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1). To date, Defendants have not filed a response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion. Nor have they filed a request for extension of their deadline. Accordingly, and in accordance with Local Rule 7.1, Plaintiffs’ motion GRANTED as unopposed. Defendants are ordered to provide the discovery responses specified in pages 6-12 of Plaintiffs’ motion ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 19, 2016. (DE 12.) If the parties cannot work out the privilege issues identified in Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ requests for production of documents 5 and 9, Defendants may provide those documents to the undersigned for an in camera review. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 5, 2016 s/Anthony P. Patti Anthony P. Patti UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on January 5, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. s/Michael Williams Case Manager for the Honorable Anthony P. Patti   2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?