McCallum et al v. Geelhood et al
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING (UNOPPOSED) Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Compel--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ANTHONY MCCALLUM, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:15-CV-12676
District Judge Denise Page Hood
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
v.
STEPHEN GEELHOOD, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
(DE 12)
Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel discovery on December 10, 2015. (DE
12.) Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1, if Defendants wished to oppose the motion, they
had fourteen days in which to file a response, thereby making their response due on
December 25, 2015, a legal holiday. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(c) and (e)(2).
Defendants’ response was therefore due on or before December 28, 2015, the next
day that was not a weekend or legal holiday. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1).
To date, Defendants have not filed a response in opposition to Plaintiffs’
motion. Nor have they filed a request for extension of their deadline.
Accordingly, and in accordance with Local Rule 7.1, Plaintiffs’ motion
GRANTED as unopposed. Defendants are ordered to provide the discovery
responses specified in pages 6-12 of Plaintiffs’ motion ON OR BEFORE
JANUARY 19, 2016. (DE 12.) If the parties cannot work out the privilege issues
identified in Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ requests for production of
documents 5 and 9, Defendants may provide those documents to the undersigned
for an in camera review.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2016
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on January 5, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?