Boulding v. Sudhir et al
Filing
45
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 20 Motion Requesting a Rule 26(f) Meeting - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TIMOTHY BOULDING,
Plaintiff,
No. 15-12706
v.
District Judge Robert H. Cleland
Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
BHAMINI SUDHIR, ET AL.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
Plaintiff Timothy Boulding, a pro se prison inmate in the custody of the Michigan
Department of Corrections, has filed a Motion Requesting Rule 26(f) Meeting [Doc.#20].
Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), which requires a case management conference between the
parties, specifically exempts proceedings “exempted from initial disclosure under Rule
26(a)(1)(B).” That Rule, in turn, exempts “an action brought without an attorney by a
person in the custody of the United States, as state, or a state subdivision.”
Because Plaintiff’s case is exempted from the requirements of Rule 26(f), his
motion [Doc. #20] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/R. Steven Whalen
R. STEVEN WHALEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: July 29, 2016
-1-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify on July 29, 2016 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with
the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered
electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to the following nonregistered ECF participants July 29, 2016.
s/Carolyn M. Ciesla
Case Manager for the
Honorable R. Steven Whalen
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?