Mann v. Schlottman et al

Filing 69

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 68 Motion in Objection to Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JACK MANN, Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-12869 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. SOE SCHLOTTMAN et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN OBJECTION TO ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF #68) On March 22, 2017, the Court issued an opinion and order that granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denied all of Plaintiff’s pending motions (the “Order”). (See ECF #64.) Plaintiff then filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order, which the Court also denied. (See ECF ## 66, 67). Plaintiff has now filed a motion objecting to the Court’s denial of his Motion for Reconsideration (the “Motion”). (See ECF #68.) The Motion is DENIED because Plaintiff still has not demonstrated a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled nor shown that correcting such a defect (if it exists) will result in a different disposition of the case. See Local Rule 7.1(h). If Mann has any further complaints about this Court’s rulings, 1   he should raise them in an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, if and to the extent that an appeal remains available to him. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 11, 2017 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on May 11, 2017, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (313) 234-5113 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?