Thurmond v. Southfield, City of et al

Filing 147

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' 141 Motion to Compel - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DAWAN PIERCE THURMOND, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-13167 District Judge Laurie J. Michelson Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents [Doc. #141]. Contrary to this Court’s Local Rules, Plaintiff did not attach a copy of his Requests for Production to his motion. In addition, Defendants note in their response that the Plaintiff did not properly serve his Requests to Produce. This Court struck a previous motion to compel filed by Plaintiff for nonconformance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Here, Plaintiff has requested production of documents set forth in” his amended complaint. He has not properly served discovery requests following the Rule 16 scheduling conference, as the Court ordered. While pro se litigants are given some leeway, Plaintiff was instructed that he was required to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules. Discovery is still open, and is set to close on March 3, 2017 [Doc. #128]. -1- Plaintiff has the opportunity to properly serve on Defendants’ counsel his Interrogatories and Requests to Produce. Because he has not done so to date, his motion to compel [Doc. #141] is DENIED. Defendants’ request for costs [Doc. #142] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ R. Steven Whalen R. STEVEN WHALEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: November 28, 2016 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on November 28, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. mail. s/Carolyn M. Ciesla Case Manager to the Honorable R. Steven Whalen -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?