Miller v. Generac Power Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 42

ORDER granting 41 plaintiff's Motion to extend summons. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO. 15-CV-13256 HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH GLENN RONNIE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. and DOOSAN INFRACORE CO., LTD., Defendants. ________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND SUMMONS   This products liability case arises out of plaintiff Glenn Miller’s serious injuries sustained while he was working on a generator manufactured by defendant Generac Power Systems, Inc. (“Generac”). On November 30, 2016, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to amend the Complaint to add Doosan Infracore Co., Ltd. (“defendant”), a South Korean corporation, as a defendant. On December 5, 2016, plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint and on the same date, the summons issued. Now before the court is plaintiff’s motion to extend the summons 90-days because defendant is a South Korean corporation, service must be according to the Hague Convention, and translation of the First Amended Complaint is -1    required before service may be completed. Plaintiff represents that it may take six months for service of process and has submitted a copy of a letter by a company that conducts service of process on defendants residing in foreign countries, including South Korea, to that effect. The 90-day time limit for service of process under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) does not apply to foreign corporations under Rule 4(h)(2) and 4(f) and leaves the time period open. The Hague Convention provides for a time limit of sixmonths. See Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. Ink Tech. Printer Supplies, LLC, 295 F.R.D. 259, 261 (S.D. Ohio 2013) (citing Advisory Committee Notes to Subdivision (f)(3)). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to extend the summons (Doc. 41) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must serve the summons and a copy of the First Amended Complaint on defendant Doosan Infracore Co., Ltd. on or before June 5, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 15, 2016 s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on December 15, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Marcia Beauchemin Deputy Clerk -3   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?