Wolfe v. Colvin
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 28 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
ROBERT L. WOLFE,
Case No. 15-13854
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
R. STEVEN WHALEN
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ; AND DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT  AND REMANDING CASE
On December 15, 2016, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a Report and
Recommendation (R&R)  on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
 and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment . This R&R
recommended that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, deny
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and remand the case for an award of
benefits under 42 §405(g). Faucher v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17
F. 3d 171 (6th Cir. 1994). Neither party has filed any objection to the Report and
Page 1 of 2
The Court having reviewed the record, the Report and Recommendation 
is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment  is
GRANTED and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment  is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is REMANDED for an award
of benefits consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
THIS CASE IS CLOSED.
Dated: January 12, 2017
s/Arthur J. Tarnow
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?