Wahlstrom v. Monk et al

Filing 33

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 23 Motion to Amend/Correct AND RESOLVING PLAINTIFF'S 24 Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Production, Compel Depositions and to Extend the Dates for Discovery - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEBORAH WAHLSTROM, Plaintiff, vs. JASON MONK, EDWARD BRULEY, GLENN VOORHESS, JEANINE WALKER, and MOUNT CLEMENS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Case No.: 15-cv-14113 Hon. Denise Page Hood Mag. R. Steven Whalen Defendants. DEBORAH GORDON LAW Deborah L. Gordon (P27058) Benjamin I. Shipper (P77558) Attorneys for Plaintiff 33 Bloomfield Hills Parkway, Suite 220 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304 (248) 258-2500 dgordon@deborahgordonlaw.com bshipper@deborahgordonlaw.com PLUNKETT COONEY Michael D. Weaver (P43985) Courtney L. Nichols (P75160) Attorneys for Defendants 38505 Woodward Avenue, Ste. 2000 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304 (248) 901-4025 mweaver@plunkettcooney.com cnichols@plunkettcooney.com ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF DEBORAH WAHLSTROM’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT (DKT. #23) AND MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, COMPEL DEPOSITIONS, AND TO EXTEND THE DATES FOR DISCOVERY (DKT #24) WHEREAS, on November 2, 2016, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Amend Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 (Dkt. #23) (“Motion to Amend”), and her Motion to Compel Defendants’ Responses to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production, Compel Depositions, and to Extend the Dates for Discovery (Dkt. #24) (“Motion to Compel”); WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel has been resolved by agreement between the parties; WHEREAS, this Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Dkt #23) on November 29, 2016, and the Court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Dkt. #23) is GRANTED for the reasons stated on the record; and IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that, because Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel has been resolved by agreement between the parties, the terms set forth in the “Resolved Issues” portion of the filed Joint List of Resolved and Unresolved Issues (Dkt. #29), as modified by the two alterations below, are binding on the parties: 1. With respect to Paragraph 2 of the Resolved Issues, Patrick Maceroni is not required to submit his work computer to Spectrum Computer Forensics and Risk Management LLC (“Spectrum”); and 2 2. With respect to Paragraph 2 of the Resolved Issues, the individuals referenced therein must submit their personal and work computers, email addresses, and mobile devices (including phones and tablets) to Spectrum by December 16, 2016. s/R. Steven Whalen R. STEVEN WHALEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: December 6, 2016 _____________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on December 6, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to the following non-registered ECF participants on December 6, 2016: None s/Carolyn M. Ciesla Case Manager to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?