Christenson et al v. Michigan, State of et al
ORDER denying 38 defendants' Motion to Strike or, in the alternative, for leave to file supplemental brief in support of opposition to plaintiffs' motion to alter or amend judgment. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
JAMES CHRISTENSON, et al.,
Case No. 15-14441
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
JAMES OSTERHOUT, and
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE OR, IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT (DOC. 38)
On January 24, 2017, the Court entered an opinion and order
granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. (Doc. 31). On February 15, 2017, plaintiffs filed a motion to
alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). (Doc. 33).
Plaintiffs filed an amended motion to amend/correct a judgment on
February 16, 2017. (Doc. 34). Defendants filed a response on February
28, 2017. (Doc. 35). Plaintiffs thereafter filed a reply, (Doc. 36), and
supplemental evidence, (Doc. 37).
This matter is presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to
strike plaintiffs’ reply, (Doc. 36), and supplemental evidence, (Doc. 37), or
in the alternative, for leave to file a supplemental brief. (Doc. 38). The
Court shall consider plaintiffs’ reply and supplemental evidence. The
Court, however, does not require additional briefing from defendants. An
order denying plaintiffs’ amended motion to amend/correct a judgment,
(Doc. 39), was issued August 1, 2017. Defendants’ motion is, therefore,
DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 1, 2017
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
August 1, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on
James Christenson, 22014 Fresard,
Saint Clair Shores, MI 48080.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?