Bennett v. MDOC et al

Filing 156

ORDER (1) Granting Plaintiff's 153 Motion to File Supplemental Brief and (2) Granting Defendants' Leave to File a Response to Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-14465-MFL-RSW ECF No. 156 filed 05/19/20 PageID.2332 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CARL BENNETT #298713, Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-14465 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF (ECF No. 153) AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF This action is a civil rights suit brought by Plaintiff Carl Bennett, a former prisoner who was incarcerated in the Michigan Department of Corrections. (See Fourth Am. Compl., ECF No. 121.) On September 26, 2019, a group of Defendants known as the “Corizon Defendants” moved for summary judgment. (See Mot., ECF No. 127.) Bennett filed a response to the motion on March 26, 2020. (See Resp. Br., ECF No. 142.) On May 14, 2020, Bennett filed a motion with the Court to file a revised brief opposing the Corizon Defendants’ summary judgment motion. (See Mot., ECF No. 153.) Bennett explained that due to an “oversight,” his initial opposition brief did not address all of the arguments that the Corizon Defendants had raised in their 1 Case 2:15-cv-14465-MFL-RSW ECF No. 156 filed 05/19/20 PageID.2333 Page 2 of 3 motion. (See id.) The Corizon Defendants oppose Bennett’s request. (See Br., ECF No. 154.) The Court has reviewed Bennett’s motion and the Corizon Defendants’ response. In order to ensure that there is a full presentation of all of the issues in dispute between the parties, the Court will GRANT Bennett’s motion to file his revised brief. In addition, so that the Court has a complete understanding of both parties’ positions, the Court will also grant the Corizon Defendants leave to file a supplemental brief, of up to 10 pages, to respond to Bennett’s revised opposition brief. Accordingly, for all of the reasons stated above, Bennett’s motion to file a revised brief opposing the Corizon Defendants’ summary judgment motion (ECF No. 153) is GRANTED. Bennett shall file with the Court the revised brief attached as Exhibit A to his motion by no later than May 22, 2020. The Corizon Defendants may file a supplemental brief addressing Bennett’s revised response, of no more than 10 pages, by no later than June 12, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 19, 2020 2 Case 2:15-cv-14465-MFL-RSW ECF No. 156 filed 05/19/20 PageID.2334 Page 3 of 3 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on May 19, 2020, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?