Archer-Gift v. Citigroup, Inc. et al
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE (Doc. 22). Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CYNTHIA ARCHER-GIFT,
Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 15-14467
CITIGROUP, INC.,
THE HOME DEPOT, INC., and
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.,
HON. AVERN COHN
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
AND TO STRIKE (Doc. 22)
This is a case under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Plaintiff Cynthia
Archer-Gift (Archer) seeks damages relating to the denial of her applications for credit at
Defendants The Home Depot, Inc. (Home Depot) and Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears).
Archer is suing Home Depot, Sears, and Defendant Citigroup, Inc. (Citigroup), which is
named as a defendant because it is listed as a creditor on denial letters addressed to
her, because, she says, she never received written notice of the reasons for the denial
from Home Depot and the notice from Sears was deficient.
The Defendants have moved to dismiss and to strike class allegations.
The Court BIFURCATES the issues of liability on the individual counts and the
class counts until further order of the Court. The class allegations must abide decision
on the individual counts. Defendants’ motion to strike is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
The Court declines to dismiss the individual counts. There is a factual issue of
whether Archer received an adverse action notice from Home Depot and the statement
in the Sears notice “Unable to comply with consumer statement” lacks precision.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Defendants intend to file a motion for summary judgment within 21 days. Archer
shall have 14 days to respond.
SO ORDERED.
S/Avern Cohn
AVERN COHN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 29, 2016
Detroit, Michigan
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?