Ali v. Colvin
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
MUSA HASSAN ALI,
Case No. 15-14483
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ARTHUR J. TARNOW
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PATRICIA T. MORRIS
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; GRANTING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ; AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 
On January 20, 2017, Magistrate Judge Morris issued a Report and
Recommendation  on the parties’ motions for summary judgment [13, 18].
Neither party filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation. Judge Morris
recommended the following:
Plaintiff Musa Hassan Ali’s Motion for Summary Judgment  be
granted in part as to the analysis of Listing 3.02A or B, but denied in
all other respects;
Defendant Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment  be
denied in part; and
This case be remanded for further proceedings under Sentence Four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1
Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) states: The court shall have power to enter, upon
the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing
the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause
for a rehearing.
The Court having reviewed the record, the Report and Recommendation 
is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment  is
GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff’s claim is REMANDED to the Commissioner
for further proceedings consistent with this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment  is DENIED IN PART.
Dated: February 23, 2017
s/Arthur J. Tarnow
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?