McCormack v. Westland et al

Filing 98

ORDER Denying 91 Petition for Attorney's Fees as Moot and Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARIA MCCORMACK, Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-14507 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. CITY OF WESTLAND, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (ECF #91) AS MOOT AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE On July 30, 2018, Plaintiff's former counsel, Elizabeth Downey, filed a petition for attorney’s fees. (See ECF #91.) Ms. Downey well deserves a fee award in this action because she obtained a very favorable settlement for Plaintiff. However, as this Court explained in a series of earlier orders (see ECF ## 90, 94, 97), Plaintiff refused to execute the documentation necessary to finalize the settlement, and for that reason the Court dismissed this action with prejudice – without any payment from Defendants to Plaintiff. (See ECF #97.) Absent a payment to Plaintiff, there is no source of funds for an attorney’s fee award. Accordingly, Ms. Downey's request for a fee award is DENIED AS MOOT. This denial is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. In the event that this action is reinstated and a 1 payment made to Plaintiff, this Court would revisit the fee petition and likely enter a fee award in Ms. Downey's favor. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 24, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on September 24, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?