National Labor Relations Board v. Brown
Filing
6
ORDER Adopting 5 Report and Recommendation and Granting 1 Motion for Order Enforcing Subpoena. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,
Petitioner,
Case No. 15-MC-51373
v.
HON. DENISE PAGE HOOD
ANTON BROWN,
Respondent.
_____________________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
and
GRANTING MOTION FOR ORDER ENFORCING SUBPOENA
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s
Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5) on Petitioner’s Motion for an Order
Enforcing Subpoena Ad Testificandum. To date, no Objections have been filed to the
Report and Recommendation and the time to file such has passed.
The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds that the
Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion. The Court agrees with the
Magistrate Judge that Petitioner is entitled to an order enforcing the subpoena issued
to Respondent pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3410(c).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner National Labor Relations Board’s
Motion for an Order Enforcing Subpoena Ad Testificandum (Doc. No. 1) is
GRANTED. The subpoena ad testificandum issued to Respondent is enforced.
Respondent must comply with the subpoena issued by Petitioner at the time and place
set by Petitioner.
S/Denise Page Hood
Denise Page Hood
United States District Judge
Dated: December 21, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of
record on December 21, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/LaShawn R. Saulsberry
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?