National Labor Relations Board v. Brown

Filing 6

ORDER Adopting 5 Report and Recommendation and Granting 1 Motion for Order Enforcing Subpoena. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, Case No. 15-MC-51373 v. HON. DENISE PAGE HOOD ANTON BROWN, Respondent. _____________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and GRANTING MOTION FOR ORDER ENFORCING SUBPOENA This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5) on Petitioner’s Motion for an Order Enforcing Subpoena Ad Testificandum. To date, no Objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file such has passed. The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Petitioner is entitled to an order enforcing the subpoena issued to Respondent pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3410(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner National Labor Relations Board’s Motion for an Order Enforcing Subpoena Ad Testificandum (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED. The subpoena ad testificandum issued to Respondent is enforced. Respondent must comply with the subpoena issued by Petitioner at the time and place set by Petitioner. S/Denise Page Hood Denise Page Hood United States District Judge Dated: December 21, 2015 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on December 21, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/LaShawn R. Saulsberry Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?