Wejrandt v. United States Attorney General et al
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 20 denying pltf's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting deft's Motion for Summary Judgment 16 Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CBet)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
DAVID RAYMOND WEJRANDT,
Case No. 16-10018
Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
JULY 11, 2017 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
In a report and recommendation ("R & R") issued on July 11, 2017, Magistrate Judge
David R. Grand recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff David Raymond Wejrandt's
motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's
motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R, and the
deadline for doing so has passed. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report
releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, No. 0910933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citation omitted).
Nonetheless, having reviewed the R & R, the parties' underlying summary judgment
motions, and the administrative record, the Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge's
analysis, and therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s R & R.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that Plaintiff's
October 13, 2016 motion for summary judgment  is DENIED, that Defendant's October
27, 2016 motion for summary judgment  is GRANTED, and that the administrative
decision denying Plaintiff's claim for benefits is AFFIRMED.
s/Nancy G. Edmunds
Nancy G. Edmunds
United States District Judge
Dated: August 28, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on August 28, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Carol J. Bethel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?