Dougherty v. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. et al
Filing
79
ORDER GRANTING 69 Sealed Motion- Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KEVIN L. DOUGHERTY,
Plaintiff,
No. 16-10089
v.
District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow
Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
ESPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
ET AL.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
For the reasons stated on the record on July 25, 2019, Plaintiff’s Motion to
Challenge Defendants’ Confidentiality Designations [Doc. #69] is GRANTED.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), any objections to this Order must be filed within
14 days of the date of this Order.1 This Order is STAYED for 14 days, or until further
order of the District Judge assigned to this case.
The hearing on this motion, conducted on July 25, 2019, including written
transcriptions and electronic recordings of the hearing, is SEALED until further order of
the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 30, 2019
1
s/R. Steven Whalen
R. STEVEN WHALEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
A district judge may reconsider a magistrate judge’s non-dispositive order “where
it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to
law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify on July 30, 2019 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with
the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered
electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to non-registered ECF
participants on July 30, 2019.
s/Carolyn M. Ciesla
Case Manager for the
Honorable R. Steven Whalen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?