Dougherty v. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. et al

Filing 79

ORDER GRANTING 69 Sealed Motion- Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KEVIN L. DOUGHERTY, Plaintiff, No. 16-10089 v. District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen ESPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC., ET AL., Defendants. / ORDER For the reasons stated on the record on July 25, 2019, Plaintiff’s Motion to Challenge Defendants’ Confidentiality Designations [Doc. #69] is GRANTED. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), any objections to this Order must be filed within 14 days of the date of this Order.1 This Order is STAYED for 14 days, or until further order of the District Judge assigned to this case. The hearing on this motion, conducted on July 25, 2019, including written transcriptions and electronic recordings of the hearing, is SEALED until further order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 30, 2019 1 s/R. Steven Whalen R. STEVEN WHALEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE A district judge may reconsider a magistrate judge’s non-dispositive order “where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on July 30, 2019 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to non-registered ECF participants on July 30, 2019. s/Carolyn M. Ciesla Case Manager for the Honorable R. Steven Whalen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?