Green v. COLVIN
ORDER accepting 20 Report and Recommendation, plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 16 is Granted and defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 18 is Denied and case REMANDED for further consideration under sentence four of 42 USC 405(g) Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 16-10093
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
MAG. JUDGE PATRICIA MORRIS
Commissioner of Social Security,
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 20)
This matter is before the Court on the parties cross-motions for
summary judgment as to plaintiff Paule Green’s claim for judicial review of
defendant Carolyn Colvin’s decision denying plaintiff’s claims for a period of
disability and supplemental security income. On December 21, 2016,
Magistrate Judge Morris issued a report and recommendation
recommending that plaintiff’s motion be granted, that defendant’s motion be
denied, and that the case be remanded for further consideration under
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The Court has reviewed the file, record, and magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation. Objections to that report have not been filed within
the established time period. The Court accepts the report and
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the magistrate’s report
and recommendation is accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary
judgment is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be remanded for further
consideration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Dated: January 23, 2017
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
January 23, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?