Pratt v. Rivard
Filing
6
ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS REQUEST TO REOPEN (Doc. 5) Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT EARL PRATT, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 16-10236
HONORABLE AVERN COHN
STEVEN RIVARD,
Respondent.
________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S REQUEST TO REOPEN (Doc. 5)
I.
This is a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 2, 2016, the Court
dismissed the petition without prejudice as premature because Petitioner’s state
convictions and sentences were not yet final given that the Michigan Supreme Court
reversed in part and remanded his case to the trial court for re-sentencing. (Doc. 3).
The Court also noted that any challenge to the re-sentencing decision would have to be
fully exhausted in the state courts before Petitioner could seek federal habeas review.
Before the Court is Petitioner’s letter in which he says he wants to re-open his
habeas case because the trial court denied re–sentencing (indicating that it would not
impose a different sentence and affirming the original sentence) on January 21, 2016.
The Court construes the letter as a request to reopen. For the reasons that follow, the
request is DENIED.
II.
Petitioner says he seeks to challenge the trial court’s decision. However, he
must fully exhaust that claim in the state courts by pursuing appellate review of the trial
court’s re-sentencing decision before seeking federal habeas review. See O’Sullivan v.
Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999) (“state prisoners must give the state courts one full
fair opportunity to resolve any constitutional issues by invoking one complete round of
the State’s established appellate review process”). Petitioner has clearly not yet done
so. As previously stated, should Petitioner wish to pursue federal habeas review after
the exhaustion of his state court appellate remedies, he must file a new habeas petition.
SO ORDERED.
S/Avern Cohn
AVERN COHN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: March 4, 2016
Detroit, Michigan
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?