Taylor v. COLVIN
Filing
5
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Marie D. Taylor., ( Plaintiff's Response due by 2/5/2016)--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MARIE D. TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-10239
JUDGE GEORGE CARAM STEEH
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI
v.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
/
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT HER JANUARY 25,
2016 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT
PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS (DE 2)
A.
Background
On January 25, 2016, Marie D. Taylor filed a complaint (DE 1) for judicial
review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s November 23, 2015 decision. On
the same day, she also filed an application (DE 2) to proceed in district court without
prepaying fees or costs. Each of these filings was electronically filed by attorney
Wesley J. Lamey (P73613).
B.
Discussion
This case has been referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters. (DE 4.)
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (DE 2), the
Court concludes that it is not in a position to rule at this time. The form application
(AO 240) contains answers to some questions but is blank as to others. See DE 2 ¶¶
5-8.
C.
Order
Upon consideration, the application to proceed in district court without
prepaying fees or costs (DE 2) is HELD IN ABEYANCE. Within ten (10) days of
the date of this order, Plaintiff SHALL file a supplemental application which fully
answers the questions asked, preferably with the assistance of her counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 26, 2016
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on January 26, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?