Taylor v. COLVIN

Filing 5

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Marie D. Taylor., ( Plaintiff's Response due by 2/5/2016)--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARIE D. TAYLOR, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:16-CV-10239 JUDGE GEORGE CARAM STEEH MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT HER JANUARY 25, 2016 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS (DE 2) A. Background On January 25, 2016, Marie D. Taylor filed a complaint (DE 1) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s November 23, 2015 decision. On the same day, she also filed an application (DE 2) to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs. Each of these filings was electronically filed by attorney Wesley J. Lamey (P73613). B. Discussion This case has been referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters. (DE 4.) Having reviewed Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (DE 2), the Court concludes that it is not in a position to rule at this time. The form application (AO 240) contains answers to some questions but is blank as to others. See DE 2 ¶¶ 5-8. C. Order Upon consideration, the application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs (DE 2) is HELD IN ABEYANCE. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff SHALL file a supplemental application which fully answers the questions asked, preferably with the assistance of her counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2016 s/Anthony P. Patti Anthony P. Patti UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on January 26, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. s/Michael Williams Case Manager for the Honorable Anthony P. Patti

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?