United States of America v. Approximately $7,041.73 seized from Bank of America Checking Account #375008753246 held in the name of Abyssinia Love Knot Physical Therapy, LLC et al
Filing
62
ORDER continuing stay of civil forfeiture case until 10/2/17. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 16-10314
vs.
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
APPROXIMATELY $7,041.73 SEIZED
FROM BANK OF AMERICA CHECKING
ACCOUNT #375008753246 HELD
IN THE NAME OF ABYSSINIA LOVE
KNOT PHYSICAL THERAPY, LLC., et al.,
Defendant in Rem.
__________________________________/
ORDER CONTINUING STAY OF CIVIL
FORFEITURE CASE UNTIL OCTOBER 2, 2017
This matter comes before the court on the government’s July 10,
2017 status report [doc. 61] requesting that the current stay of this civil
forfeiture proceeding remain in effect pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(g) until
its companion criminal case, United States v. Shirley Douglas, et al., 2:16cr-20436-DML-APP (E.D. Mich. Jun. 16, 2016), is resolved and until such
time the government concludes its criminal investigation of the remaining
individuals listed in the Complaint. A stay was previously entered upon
stipulation for six months, expiring on April 23, 2017.
The United States requests that the stay be extended until October 2,
-1-
2017. No objections to a continuation of the stay have been voiced.
The court grants a continuation of the stay of the civil forfeiture action
until October 2, 2017. The government is required to provide an updated
status report on or before that date.
So ordered.
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 13, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
July 13, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Marcia Beauchemin
Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?