United States of America v. Approximately $7,041.73 seized from Bank of America Checking Account #375008753246 held in the name of Abyssinia Love Knot Physical Therapy, LLC et al

Filing 64

ORDER continuing stay of civil forfeiture case until March 31, 2018. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 16-10314 vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH APPROXIMATELY $7,041.73 SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA CHECKING ACCOUNT #375008753246 HELD IN THE NAME OF ABYSSINIA LOVE KNOT PHYSICAL THERAPY, LLC., et al., Defendant in Rem. __________________________________/ ORDER CONTINUING STAY OF CIVIL FORFEITURE CASE UNTIL MARCH 31, 2018 This matter comes before the court on the government’s October 2, 2017 status report [doc. 63] requesting that the current stay of this civil forfeiture proceeding remain in effect pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(g) until its companion criminal case, United States v. Shirley Douglas, et al., 2:16cr-20436-DML-APP (E.D. Mich. Jun. 16, 2016), is resolved and until such time the government concludes its criminal investigation of the remaining individuals listed in the Complaint. A stay was previously entered upon stipulation for six months, expiring on October 2, 2017. The United States requests that the stay be extended until March 31, -1- 2018. No objections to a continuation of the stay have been voiced. The court grants a continuation of the stay of the civil forfeiture action until March 31, 2018. The government is required to provide an updated status report on or before that date. So ordered. s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 16, 2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on October 16, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Marcia Beauchemin Deputy Clerk -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?