Belwood v. Trader Joe's Company et al
ORDER (1) Denying Defendants' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment and (2) Denying Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 16-cv-10815
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, et al.,
ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT (ECF #20) AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #21)
On March 7, 2016, Plaintiff Heather Belwood filed this action against
Defendants Trader Joe’s Company and Trader Joe’s East Inc. (See Compl., ECF #1.)
Belwood alleges that Defendants violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42
U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act, MCL §
37.101 et. seq. (See id.) Defendants moved for summary judgment on April 21,
2017. (See ECF #20.) Belwood also moved for summary judgment on April 21,
2017. (See ECF #21.) The Court held a hearing on the motions on July 17, 2017.
For the reasons stated on the record at the July 17, 2017, hearing, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
#20) is DENIED and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF # 21) is
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 17, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on July 17, 2017, by electronic means and/or
s/Holly A. Monda
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?