Richards v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
23
ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (SBur)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOANN RICHARDS,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO: 16-CV-10905-DT
v.
COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
/
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub
pursuant to U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In her report filed on February
16, 2017, the magistrate judge recommended that this court deny Plaintiff
Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion for Summary Judgment and grant Defendant
Michael Thomas McClure’s Motion for Summary Judgment. No objections have been
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and
conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of
this Order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment {Dkt
#16} is DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment {Dkt #19] is
GRANTED and the above action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
1
The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to
independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 6, 2017
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
and/or pro se parties on this date, March 6, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Shawna C. Burns
Case Manager Generalist
(810) 292-6522
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?