Waskul et al v. Washtenaw County Community Mental Health et al
Filing
401
CORRECTED 400 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED 316 MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND EXTENDING STAY Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DEREK WASKUL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 16-cv-10936
Honorable Linda V. Parker
v.
WASHTENAW COUNTY COMMUNITY
MENTAL HEALTH, et al.,
Defendants.
CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR DECLARATORY
JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 316) AND EXTENDING STAY
For the reasons stated on the record at the fairness hearing on December 11,
2024, and set forth in the Court’s Opinion on today’s date, Plaintiffs’ Amended
Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and for Declaratory Relief (ECF
No. 316) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court is granting Plaintiffs’ request to approve the settlement agreement, previously filed on December 1, 2023 (see ECF No. 300-1) (hereafter the “Agreement”). The Agreement
is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the public interest. It is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1 and is a part of this Order for all purposes. However, the Court is denying
Plaintiffs’ motion to the extent they sought declaratory relief relating to the binding
1
effect and enforceability of this Order and the Agreement as to Defendants
Washtenaw County Community Mental Health (“WCCMH”) and Community
Mental Health Partnership of Southeast Michigan (“CMHPSM”) (hereafter, collectively, “Local Defendants”).
In accordance with and in furtherance of the approval of the Agreement, it is
hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
Pursuant to Rule 65(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Order
binds the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (“MDHHS”), plus
(a) its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and (b) all persons in
active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice hereof
by personal service or otherwise.
2.
Continuation of Stay
(a)
The Stay of this Action, except for enforcement proceedings as
described in paragraphs 25(b) and 26 below, is hereby continued
until the Sunset Date (as defined in paragraph 25 below).
(b)
Following the Merger Date set forth in paragraph 27(a) below, the
provisions of paragraph 27 shall govern as between the Plaintiffs
and MDHHS, but Plaintiffs shall be free to seek the lifting of the
stay vis-à-vis the Local Defendants, so that Plaintiffs may pursue
their claims against the Local Defendants.
2
3.
Certain Definitions
(a)
“Policy” means the Medicaid Provider Manual.
(b)
“Adopted as Policy” means “incorporated in the Medicaid Provider Manual.”
(c)
“Amendment,” or “amend,” in the context of amendments to the
contract between MDHHS and CMHPSM, includes: (1) amending
an existing contract during a fiscal year to include the relevant
terms, or (2) executing a new contract or contract renewal in advance of a new fiscal year that includes the relevant terms.
(d)
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) is the
agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
that administers the Medicaid program.
(e)
“CLS” means the Community Living Supports service.
(f)
“CLS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule” refers to the
minimum fee schedule described herein for HSW SD CLS.
(g)
“CMHSP” is a Community Mental Health Services Program, as
that term is defined in Michigan Compiled Laws § 330.1100a(18).
(h)
“CMHPSM” is Defendant Community Mental Health Partnership
of Southeast Michigan.
3
(i)
Habilitation Supports Waiver (“HSW”) refers to the Medicaid
program of home-and-community-based services administered by
MDHHS pursuant to Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act,
the terms of which are in a waiver document filed with and approved by CMS.
(j)
HSW Self-Determination Community Living Supports (“HSW SD
CLS”) means Community Living Supports covered through and
defined by the Habilitation Supports Waiver document filed with
and approved by CMS and provided via a self-determination arrangement. This term does not include CLS that is not covered
through the Habilitation Supports Waiver, nor does it include CLS
covered through the Habilitation Support Waiver provided via any
arrangement other than a self-determination arrangement (for example, an agency arrangement).
(k)
HSW Self-Determination Overnight Health and Safety Supports
(“HSW SD OHSS”). Overnight Health and Safety Supports covered through and defined by the Habilitation Supports Waiver
document filed with and approved by CMS and provided via a
self-determination arrangement. This term does not include
OHSS that is not covered through the Habilitation Supports
4
Waiver, nor does it include OHSS covered through the Habilitation Supports Waiver provided via any arrangement other than a
self-determination arrangement (for example, an agency arrangement).
(l)
“IPOS” means the Individual Plan of Service.
(m)
“OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule” refers to the
minimum fee schedule described herein for HSW SD OHSS.
(n)
Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (“PIHPs”): the Prepaid Inpatient
Health Plans responsible for managing and paying claims for
HSW services and other services pursuant to a managed care contract with MDHHS.
(o)
“Self Determination” includes both (1) participant direction of services as described in Appendix E of the HSW, and (2) “self direction” as that term is used in MDHHS’s Self-Direction Technical
Requirements.
(p)
The Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of this Order are paragraphs 8, 9, 11, 12, and 16 hereof.
(q)
“WCCMH” is Defendant Washtenaw County Community Mental
Health.
5
(r)
Other Capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them herein or, if not so ascribed, then as ascribed in
Section B of the Agreement.
4.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this Action for purposes of enforcing
this Order until the time specified in paragraph 25(c)(iii) below.
5.
Enforcement of this Order against MDHHS shall be subject to paragraph 26
below.
6.
Revocable only in the circumstances described in paragraphs 21 and 24 be-
low, and not subject to recoupment on any basis other than for hours not expended,
MDHHS shall continue to cause Plaintiffs Derek Waskul, Kevin Wiesner, Cory
Schneider, and Hannah Ernst to have available going forward, through their Fiscal
Intermediaries, funding for their HSW SD CLS and HSW SD OHSS budgets (including such changes in authorized hours as may be effected from time to time) at
$31 per hour for HSW SD CLS and $21.70 per hour for HSW SD OHSS.
7.
MDHHS is required to implement the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of
this Order only if each of the following contingencies (the “D1 Contingencies”) is
met:
(a)
The Michigan legislature appropriates sufficient funds to pay for
capitation rate increases to implement the CLS and OHSS Self-
6
Determination Minimum Fee Schedules for HSW SD CLS and
HSW SD OHSS, respectively, for all PIHPs statewide.
(b)
CMHPSM executes a contract amendment agreeing to the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions.
(c)
CMS approves the contract amendment and capitation rate increases to account for the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination
Minimum Fee Schedules for all PIHPs statewide.
(d)
CMS approves any amendments to Michigan’s Section 1115
demonstration waivers and Michigan’s Section 1915(c) Habilitation Supports Waiver that CMS deems necessary to implement the
CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules for
all PIHPs statewide.
(e)
CMS issues any other approvals that CMS deems necessary for
implementation of the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules for all PIHPs statewide, including directed
payment approval (see 42 C.F.R. § 438.6(c)), if CMS determines
that any such approvals are necessary to implement the CLS and
OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules for all PIHPs
statewide.
7
8.
Subject to the D1 Contingencies, MDHHS shall amend its contract with
CMHPSM so that:
(a)
For each HSW SD CLS participant, the self-determination budget
created jointly by CMHPSM (or a subcontractor to which
CMHPSM delegates this function) and the participant pursuant to
Appendix E of the HSW shall provide for no less than the
amounts set forth in the CLS Self-Determination Minimum Fee
Schedule (Table 1 below), as adjusted pursuant to paragraph 16
hereof, for each authorized unit of HSW SD CLS in the participant’s IPOS.
Table 1
Service Code
Unit (.25 hour) rate
per participant
H2015
$7.75
H2015UN (2 participants) $3.87
H2015UP (3 participants) $2.59
H2015UQ (4 participants) $1.94
H2015UR (5 participants) $1.56
H2015US (6+ participants) $1.10
This means, for example, that if an IPOS provides that the HSW
SD CLS participant will receive 100 units per month of one-onone HSW SD CLS (Service Code H2015, with a unit being a 15minute increment), the funding in the associated budget for that
HSW SD CLS must be equal to or greater than $775/month (100
8
units x $7.75 minimum rate). If an IPOS specifies 2-on-1 (or
greater) CLS staffing in certain circumstances, then the budget
shall be calculated, and CMHPSM shall pay, separately at the 1on-1 rate for each staffer associated with the multiple staffing.
(b)
CMHPSM shall reimburse to the fiscal intermediary the amount
determined by the approved budget (which shall be at least the
amount determined by the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination
Minimum Fee Schedules) for HSW SD CLS and HSW SD OHSS
units, respectively, actually performed during the term of the
IPOS. Nothing in this provision shall prohibit CMHPSM from
advancing funds to the fiscal intermediary in anticipation of such
actual performance.
9.
Subject to the D1 Contingencies, MDHHS shall amend its contract with
CMHPSM to require that a minimum fee schedule (the “OHSS Self-Determination
Minimum Fee Schedule”) likewise applies to self-directed HSW SD OHSS services, with the table entries for OHSS in effect from time to time being 70% of
those for HSW SD CLS then in effect.
10.
MDHHS shall amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to reflect the content of
Attachment A of the Agreement, titled “Costs Included in Community Living
9
Supports Code H2015,” to the extent MDHHS determines that it does not already
do so.
11.
Subject to the D1 Contingencies, and subject to the adjustments set forth in
paragraph 16 hereof, the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules and the associated funding for each of them described in paragraphs 8, 9,
and 12 of this Order, shall be the totality of the funding provided to cover all costs
for the HSW SD CLS participant’s HSW SD CLS and HSW SD OHSS (e.g., staff
wages, transportation, employer costs, training, and activity fees).
12.
Subject to the D1 Contingencies, MDHHS shall increase the actuarially
sound capitation rates for CMHPSM to account for the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules.
(a)
The amount of this capitation rate increase will be at the sole discretion of MDHHS, but it will be subject to CMS’s annual approval of the amended capitation rates as actuarially sound, as required by federal Medicaid law.
(b)
This requirement will be deemed satisfied when CMS approves,
as actuarially sound, the capitation rates applicable to CMHPSM.
(c)
In addition, MDHHS shall ensure that the actuary employed by or
under contract with MDHHS to certify annual capitation rates also
certifies, at least annually, that the HSW CLS rate cell(s) of
10
MDHHS’s capitation matrix for CMHPSM are not cross-subsidized by any other rate cell and are “actuarially sound,” as that
term is defined in 42 C.F.R. § 438.4.
13.
Contingent on CMHPSM signing a contract amendment(s) containing the
relevant provision and CMS approving the contract amendment (the “D2 Contingencies” with respect to such amendment), MDHHS shall amend its contract with
CMHPSM to require CMHPSM to offer new and existing beneficiaries who receive CLS services under the HSW (other than those previously terminated from
self-determination) the choice to self-determine CLS services. To the extent the
D2 Contingencies have not been met by September 30, 2025 with respect to this
requirement, MDHHS shall promptly commence, and diligently pursue to completion, the process of Adopting such provision as Policy.
14.
MDHHS shall instruct the Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and
Rules (“MOAHR”) that it is MDHHS policy that, after the participant has exhausted the participant’s internal appeal to the PIHP/CMHSP consistent with 42
C.F.R. §§ 438.402, 438.408(f):
(a)
Administrative Law Judges (“ALJs”) in Medicaid Fair Hearings
have the authority in hearings challenging the CLS and/or OHSS
portions of an HSW SD CLS participant’s self-determination
budget:
11
(i)
To review HSW SD CLS participants’ assertions that an
insufficient number of units of HSW SD CLS or HSW
SD OHSS was authorized and issue orders as specified in
subparagraphs (b) and (c) below. For the avoidance of
doubt, the instruction to MOAHR set forth in this paragraph 14(a)(i) shall include that the scope of the ALJs’
authority to review such assertions, and enter orders with
respect thereto, includes an assertion by the HSW SD
CLS participant regarding the proper allocation between
HSW SD CLS and HSW SD OHSS, as those services are
defined in the Medicaid Provider Manual; and
(ii)
To review the budget attached to an HSW SD CLS participant’s IPOS and issue orders as specified in subparagraphs (b) and (c) below.
(b)
When reviewing the CLS and/or OHSS portions of an HSW SD
CLS recipient’s self-determination budget, or the number of units
of HSW SD CLS or HSW SD OHSS that have been authorized,
ALJs have authority to issue an order, if appropriate based on the
proofs presented on the record at the hearing, to:
12
(i)
reverse the determination and require a specific budget or
authorization as described in paragraph (c)(i) below, or
(ii)
reverse the determination and remand to the PIHP/
CMHPSM for further evidence or assessment as described in paragraph (c)(ii) below, or
(iii)
affirm the determination as described in paragraph (c)(iii)
below.
(c)
Specifically,
(i)
If the ALJ concludes that the proofs presented on the record at the hearing establish that the PIHP/CMHSP’s decision with respect to the HSW SD CLS and/or HSW SD
OHSS portions of an HSW SD CLS participant’s self-determination budget and/or the number of authorized units
of HSW SD CLS or HSW SD OHSS was inconsistent
with medical necessity as set forth in the Medicaid Provider Manual and that such proofs establish that a specific budget level or authorization requested by the participant is: (1) medically necessary, (2) otherwise consistent with state and federal law and policy, and (3) necessary to implement the IPOS, then the ALJ shall reverse
13
the determination and direct entry of the specific budget
level or number of authorized units of HSW SD CLS or
HSW SD OHSS requested by the participant.
(ii)
If the ALJ concludes that the proofs presented on the record at the hearing establish that the PIHP/CMHSP’s decision with respect to the CLS and/or OHSS portions of an
HSW SD CLS participant’s self-determination budget
and/or the number of authorized units of HSW SD CLS
or HSW SD OHSS was inconsistent with medical necessity as set forth in the Medicaid Provider Manual but that
such proofs do not establish that a specific budget level
or number of authorized units is (1) medically necessary,
(2) otherwise consistent with state or federal law and policy, and (3) necessary to implement the IPOS, then the
ALJ shall reverse the determination and remand to the
PIHP/CMHSP for reconsideration based on the ALJ’s
findings and order, specifying to the extent reasonably
possible the parameters of such reconsideration.
(iii)
If the ALJ concludes that the proofs presented on the record at the hearing do not establish that the
14
PIHP/CMHSP’s decision was inconsistent with medical
necessity as set forth in the Medicaid Provider Manual or
otherwise inconsistent with state or federal law or policy,
then the ALJ shall uphold the determination.
(d)
ALJs in Medicaid Fair Hearings have the authority to review
PIHPs’/CMHSPs’ decisions to terminate a self-determination arrangement.
(i)
In such a Medicaid Fair Hearing, if the ALJ determines
that the evidence presented on the record at the hearing
does not establish that there was good cause to terminate
the self-determination arrangement, then the ALJ will reverse the PIHP/CMHSP’s decision to terminate the selfdetermination arrangement and direct the continuation of
such arrangement, rather than remand to the PIHP/
CMHSP for reconsideration.
(ii)
The requirement in paragraph 14(d)(i) shall be implemented as Policy notwithstanding any provision of existing MDHHS Policy or guidance stating that termination
of self-determination is not the subject of a Medicaid Fair
Hearing.
15
(e)
MDHHS shall supply to counsel for Plaintiffs a copy of the instruction to MOAHR required by this paragraph 14.
(f)
Notwithstanding such instruction to MOAHR, MDHHS may reserve to itself, as opposed to the ALJ, the final decision as to the
authorized budget, the service authorization level, or the termination of self-determination arrangements, provided, however, that
the ultimate determination be made within the timeframe for “final
administrative action” as set forth in 42 C.F.R. § 431.244(f).
15.
MDHHS shall:
(a)
Amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to reflect the content of Attachment B of the Agreement, to the extent MDHHS determines
that it does not already do so.
(b)
Amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to require that PIHPs (or
CMHSPs acting on their behalf) discuss with the HSW SD CLS
participant during the person-centered planning process various
components of CLS, such as transportation, activities, staff wages,
employer costs, training time, and similar topics, as well as, if relevant, the amount, scope, and frequency of each such component
that may be medically necessary for the participant, as defined by
Attachment B to the Agreement.
16
(c)
Amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to require that PIHPs (or
CMHSPs acting on their behalf) ensure that the fiscal intermediary
does not make a final determination on the amount, scope, or duration of services and that the PIHP (or its CMHSP subcontractor)
does not delegate any aspect of creating the budget to fiscal intermediary personnel.
(d)
Amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to require that PIHPs (or
CMHSPs acting on their behalf) notify in writing any HSW SD
CLS participant whose self-determination arrangement is at risk of
termination that such risk exists.
(i)
The notice shall specify in such detail as is reasonably
practicable the issues that have led to the risk of termination, and shall provide opportunities for meaningful problem solving that involve the HSW SD CLS participant.
(ii)
If, notwithstanding the problem-solving efforts, the PIHP
(or the CMHSP as its subcontractor) believes that termination is necessary, then it shall issue an Advance Action Notice, with appeal rights consistent with those provided in 42 C.F.R. § 438.400 et seq.
17
(e)
Subject to the D2 Contingencies, amend the Contract with
CMHPSM to add a new sentence to paragraph 1(Q) (General Requirements in Schedule A – Statement of Work) to read: “The
Contractor shall comply with any decision issued by an Administrative Law Judge in a Medicaid Fair Hearing.”
(f)
Subject to the D2 Contingencies, amend the contract with
CMHPSM to require that, when CMHPSM reduces an HSW SD
CLS participant’s self-determination budget at an annual renewal
or otherwise, CMHPSM provide, in writing, a specific justification for the reduction, which shall explain why CMHPSM believes the participant does not need the same amount, duration,
and scope of HSW services that the participant was previously assessed to need. To the extent the D2 Contingencies have not been
met by September 30, 2025 with respect to this requirement,
MDHHS shall promptly commence, and diligently pursue to completion, the process of Adopting such provision as Policy. For the
avoidance of doubt:
(i)
A budget reduction or termination during the term of an
IPOS shall be treated as a “reduction, suspension, or termination” for purposes of internal appeal and Fair
18
Hearing rules (including advance Adverse Benefit Determination notice and continuation of benefits, when applicable), and
(ii)
A budget reduction or termination at annual renewal shall
be treated as a denial of a requested service, but
CMHPSM shall, in the absence of exigent circumstances,
provide the written justification required herein as soon
as practicable and, in any event, no later than 14 days before the PCP meeting for the renewal.
(g)
Subject to the D2 Contingencies, amend the contract with
CMHPSM to require that, when WCCMH does not approve, or
approves a limited authorization of, a request for inclusion in the
IPOS of: (i) a service, or (ii) one or more specific aspects of the
amount, scope, or duration of a service, CMHPSM shall ensure
that:
(i)
the item is listed in a separate section of the IPOS titled
“Requests Not Approved,” and
(ii)
WCCMH provides an adverse benefit determination that
briefly but concretely sets forth its reasoning for not approving the request.
19
The requirements in this paragraph 15(g) shall apply regardless of
whether the non-approval or limited approval takes place during the person-centered planning process or after its conclusion. To the extent the
D2 Contingencies have not been met by September 30, 2025 with respect to this paragraph 15(g), MDHHS shall promptly commence, and
diligently pursue to completion, the process of Adopting such provision
as Policy.
16.
Effective for the rates applicable to SFY 2026 (beginning October 1, 2025)
and thereafter, the rates in the CLS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule in
each fiscal year, if the CLS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule is in effect
as required herein, shall be the rate set forth in Table 1 in paragraph 8 hereof (the
“Base Rates”) adjusted by the cumulative percentage change in the nationwide
Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for
the period beginning March 31, 2024 and ending on the March 31 preceding the
start of the fiscal year in question (that is, the rates for SFY 2027 shall be the Base
Rates adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-W from March 31, 2024 to
March 31, 2026), provided, however, that the rates in the CLS Self-Determination
Minimum Fee Schedule in any fiscal year, shall not be less than the Base Rates set
forth in Table 1. For example:
20
• If the CPI-W increases by 3 percent from March 31, 2024 to
March 31, 2025, the rates applicable for SFY 2026 shall be the
Base Rates increased by 3 percent.
• If the CPI-W decreases by 3 percent from March 31, 2024 to
March 31, 2025, the rates applicable for SFY 2026 shall be the
Base Rates without any adjustment.
• If the CPI-W increases by 5 percent from March 31, 2024 to
March 31, 2026, the rates applicable for SFY 2027 shall be the
Base Rates increased by 5 percent.
17.
Providing Non-Binding Guidance
(a)
MDHHS shall provide to PIHPs and CMHSPs non-binding guidance containing examples illustrating the operation of the contract
and Policy amendments effected hereby that MDHHS, in its sole
discretion, deems appropriate.
(b)
If Attachment C of the Agreement takes effect, then no later than
90 days after it does so, MDHHS shall provide to PIHPs and
CMHSPs non-binding guidance containing examples illustrating
the operation of Attachment C of the Agreement that MDHHS, in
its sole discretion, deems appropriate.
21
(c)
MDHHS shall consult with counsel for Plaintiffs concerning such
non-binding guidance, but the form and content thereof remain in
MDHHS’s sole discretion.
18.
MDHHS shall request from the Michigan legislature that an appropriation to
fund the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules be included
in the ongoing and base part of MDHHS’s budget, rather than included as a onetime appropriation.
19.
MDHHS will provide Plaintiffs an opportunity to comment on MDHHS’s
draft applications to CMS for approval of any applicable state plan amendments,
waiver amendments, or state-directed payments required to implement the Settlement Agreement, and MDHHS will consider Plaintiffs’ comments.
20.
All of the requirements herein except the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions
shall become effective on March 2, 2025, and all requirements herein shall remain
in effect thereafter until the Sunset Date described in paragraph 25 below, at which
point all provisions of this Order shall no longer be enforceable and the obligations
herein shall cease to exist, except for the provisions of paragraph 27 of this Order.
(a)
To the extent that some of the requirements herein (for example,
contract amendments and Medicaid Provider Manual modifications) are not completed by until after March 2, 2025, MDHHS
will not be deemed in violation of this Order so long as it
22
continues to make diligent, good faith efforts to finalize what is
required to implement these requirements.
21.
On the date 10 calendar days after Director Hertel or her successor certifies
to Plaintiffs and the Court that all of the D1 Contingencies have been met:
(a)
the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of this Order (i.e., paragraphs 8, 9, 11, 12, and 16 hereof) shall become operative, and
(b)
the interim funding for Plaintiffs Derek Waskul, Kevin Wiesner,
Cory Schneider, and Hannah Ernst under paragraph 6 above shall
be terminated and shall be supplanted by such Minimum Fee
Schedule Provisions.
22.
MDHHS shall make good faith efforts to satisfy the D1 Contingencies as
promptly as reasonably practicable given the nature of the Contingencies.
(a)
If any such D1 Contingencies have not been met by June 1, 2025
(the “Drop Dead Date”), and there has not by that time been express written consent of all Parties to an extension of the Drop
Dead Date, then the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of the Settlement Agreement shall not come into effect.
(b)
Notwithstanding subparagraph (a) above, if the only uncompleted
Contingencies as of the Drop Dead Date are PIHP contract
amendments, CMS approvals thereof, and/or CMS approvals of
23
the new capitated rates, then the Drop Dead Date shall be deemed
extended by six months as to those uncompleted amendments and
approvals only.
23.
If the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of this Order have not come into
effect by the date that is 30 days before the Drop Dead Date, MDHHS shall at that
time begin, and shall complete by 120 days after the Drop Dead Date or, if applicable, the extended Drop Dead Date, the process for making amendments to the
Medicaid Provider Manual that are necessary to reflect the contents of Attachment
C of the Agreement.
24.
Sixty (60) days after the Drop Dead Date, or, if applicable, the extended
Drop Dead Date, the obligation of MDHHS to make the payments to or on behalf
of the individual Plaintiffs as described in paragraph 6 hereof shall expire.
25.
On September 30, 2029 (the “Sunset Date”), all provisions of this Order
shall expire, except for paragraph 27 hereof.
(a)
In anticipation of such expiration, MDHHS shall begin no later
than April 1, 2029, and shall complete before June 30, 2029, the
process for making amendments to the Medicaid Provider Manual
to reflect the content of Attachment C of the Agreement.
(b)
Any motion to enforce MDHHS’s obligation to promulgate the
amendments described in the foregoing paragraph 25(a) shall not
24
be subject to the informal consultation obligations of paragraph 26(a)(i) of this Order and shall be filed before the Sunset
Date. Such motion shall remain within the Court’s jurisdiction,
including after the Sunset Date as described in paragraph 25(c)(i)
below.
(c)
Upon the Sunset Date, excepting only paragraphs 27 below
and 25(b) above, all provisions of this Order shall no longer be enforceable against MDHHS, and the obligations of MDHHS herein
shall cease to exist.
(i)
Upon the later of the Sunset Date or, if a motion is filed
pursuant to paragraph 25(b) above then 90 days after the
entry of a court order that fully adjudicates such a motion, the Action may, upon motion, be dismissed as
against MDHHS.
(ii)
Such dismissal as against MDHHS shall be with prejudice as to any claims accruing prior to the Sunset Date
and without prejudice as to any claims accruing thereafter.
(iii)
Upon such dismissal, the Court’s continuing jurisdiction
over the Settlement Agreement shall cease.
25
(iv)
Neither such dismissal, nor the expiration of MDHHS’s
obligations under this Order, shall by itself effect the
modification or vacatur of any policies, guidance, or
other actions implemented by MDHHS pursuant hereto,
but such policies, guidance, or other actions shall upon
such expiration and dismissal be subject to ordinary regulatory processes of amendment, vacatur, or modification.
26.
Enforcement; Limitation of Remedy Against MDHHS and Preservation of
Rights and Remedies Against Local Defendants.
(a)
Enforcement of this Order shall be sought by motion in this Action (to which the stay in this Order shall not apply) and shall be
subject to the following procedures:
(i)
No less than 30 days prior to filing any motion related to
enforcement of this Order, the moving Party shall notify
the non-moving Party of the alleged noncompliance and
request a meeting for the purpose of attempting to resolve
the alleged noncompliance.
(ii)
If the Parties fail to resolve the allegation of noncompliance raised in the informal consultation described in
26
paragraph 26(a)(i), either Party may file a motion with
the Court seeking a judicial determination on the issue.
(iii)
Motions relating to alleged noncompliance will not seek
to hold MDHHS in criminal contempt of court.
(iv)
Motions relating to alleged noncompliance will not seek
to hold MDHHS in civil contempt of court except based
on an allegation of MDHHS’s willful noncompliance
with a previous order of enforcement on the same subject
matter. If Plaintiffs do bring a motion to hold MDHHS
in civil contempt of court under the limitations in this
paragraph, the Court may hold MDHHS in civil contempt
of court only if the Court makes a finding of MDHHS’s
willful noncompliance with a previous order of enforcement on the same subject matter. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude Plaintiffs from seeking attorneys’
fees and costs on a motion to enforce, whether under 42
U.S.C. § 1988 or otherwise.
(b)
During any time for which MDHHS is required by this Order to
place the contents of Attachment C of the Agreement in the Medicaid Provider Manual, any enforcement actions brought by
27
Plaintiffs against MDHHS related to “costing out” of an HSW SD
CLS and/or HSW SD OHSS budget, or the sufficiency of such
budget to implement the IPOS, are limited to whether MDHHS
complied with the requirements of this Order to place the contents
of Attachment C of the Agreement in the Medicaid Provider Manual.
(c)
Plaintiffs’ forbearance of enforcement directly against MDHHS in
subparagraph (b) shall not limit the right of Plaintiffs to seek enforcement of Attachment C of the Agreement, including without
limitation the costing out and sufficiency provisions thereof,
against WCCMH or CMHPSM.
(d)
Nothing herein shall prevent Plaintiffs from continuing to prose-
cute the Action against CMHPSM and/or WCCMH, and nothing herein
shall limit the relief Plaintiffs may seek against those Defendants.
27.
Merger of Claims into This Order
(a)
On March 3, 2025 (the “Merger Date”), but effective as of December 11, 2024, all claims that Plaintiffs brought or could have
brought against MDHHS in this Action shall be extinguished as
separate claims and shall merge into this Order.
28
(b)
From and after the Merger Date, Plaintiffs shall have no further
recourse against MDHHS in respect of such merged and extinguished claims except pursuant to the terms hereof.
(c)
The claims compromised, settled, and resolved by the Agreement,
and merged into and extinguished by this Order pursuant to subparagraph (a) above, include all claims that were raised in the
Complaint or Amended Complaint, and all claims that could have
been raised in the Complaint or Amended Complaint, on behalf of
all Plaintiffs. As of the Merger Date, in consideration of the obligations contained herein, and the benefits provided or to be provided, the Settlement Agreement and this Order shall fully resolve, extinguish, and finally and forever bar, and the Plaintiffs
hereby give up, all claims described in this paragraph 27.
(d)
The extinguishment of such claims, and/or their merger into this
Order, shall be limited to MDHHS and shall not preclude claims
against any other person or entity, including without limitation
WCCMH and/or CMHPSM.
(e)
Nothing herein shall preclude a Plaintiff from asserting in a Fair
Hearing that the authorized CLS units are insufficient to meet that
Plaintiff’s needs.
29
(f)
Nothing herein shall preclude a Plaintiff from asserting claims
against MDHHS that accrue after the Sunset Date in a new lawsuit.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
s/ Linda V. Parker
LINDA V. PARKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: January 27, 2025
30
EXHIBIT 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Derek Waskul, et al.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
Washtenaw County Community
Mental Health, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 16-cv-10936
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Settlement Agreement is entered into by Defendants Michigan
Department of Health and Human Services and Elizabeth Hertel, in her
official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and
Human Services (hereafter collectively referred to as “DHHS”); and
Plaintiffs Derek Waskul (guardian Cynthia Waskul), Cory Schneider
(guardians Martha Schneider and Wendy Schneider), Kevin Wiesner
(guardian Patrick Wiesner), Hannah Ernst (guardian Susan Ernst), and
Washtenaw Association for Community Advocacy (“WACA”) (hereafter
“Plaintiffs”).
1
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2016, and February 11, 2019, Plaintiffs
filed their Complaint and Amended Complaint, respectively, in the captioned proceeding (the “Action”) in the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan, and
WHEREAS, the Complaint and Amended Complaint allege a number
of violations of state and federal law arising out of the operation of the
Habilitation Supports Waiver in Washtenaw County, Michigan, and
WHEREAS, DHHS denies these claims, and,
WHEREAS, the Parties mutually desire to resolve Plaintiffs’ claims
against DHHS without the need for further litigation, and without any
admission of liability by any party.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby enter into this Settlement
Agreement to compromise, settle, and resolve all of the claims asserted
by Plaintiffs against DHHS on the following terms and conditions:
2
A.
Retention of Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Interim Payments
to Plaintiffs Waskul, Wiesner, Schneider, and Ernst
1)
This Settlement Agreement is subject to approval by the
Court, and the terms hereof shall be incorporated in the order
of approval.
a)
The Plaintiffs shall file a Motion for Approval, which may
include requests for related relief against WCCMH and
CMHPSM, no later than 30 days after execution hereof.
b)
DHHS shall join in the request for approval but need not
join in Plaintiffs’ specific arguments or the request for additional relief and may file its own papers in support of
approval. The Parties shall coordinate their filings to the
extent feasible.
c)
If the Court does not approve the Settlement Agreement,
the Parties shall work in good faith to make modifications
to address the Court’s concerns, provided that no Party is
obligated to agree to anything not already agreed-to
herein.
3
d)
If the Parties are unable to obtain approval from the
Court despite good faith efforts, this Settlement Agreement shall become null and void.
2)
Stay of Action:
a)
The Parties shall further request that the Action as a
whole be stayed pending the Court’s approval of this Settlement Agreement, which stay shall continue as between
Plaintiffs and DHHS (except as set forth in Section A(4)
below) until the Sunset Date set out in Section E(6) below.
b)
Following the Merger Date set forth in Section G(1) below, the provisions of Section G shall govern as between
the Plaintiffs and DHHS, but Plaintiffs shall be free to
seek the lifting of the stay vis-à-vis WCCMH and
CMHPSM, so that Plaintiffs may pursue their claims
against those Defendants.
3)
The Court’s order of approval shall specify that the Court retains jurisdiction of this Action for purposes of enforcing this
4
Settlement Agreement until the Sunset Date described in Section E.
4)
Enforcement of this Settlement Agreement shall be sought by
motion in this Action (to which the stay in Section A(2)(a)
shall not apply) and shall be subject to the following procedures:
a)
No less than 30 days prior to filing any motion related to
enforcement of this Settlement Agreement, the moving
Party shall notify the non-moving Party of the alleged
noncompliance and request a meeting for the purpose of
attempting to resolve the alleged noncompliance.
b)
If the Parties fail to resolve the allegation of noncompliance raised in the informal consultation described in Section A(4)(a), either Party may file a motion with the Court
seeking a judicial determination on the issue.
c)
Motions relating to alleged noncompliance will not seek
to hold DHHS in criminal contempt of court.
d)
Motions relating to alleged noncompliance will not seek
to hold DHHS in civil contempt of court except based on
5
an allegation of DHHS’s willful noncompliance with a
previous order of enforcement on the same subject matter. If Plaintiffs do bring a motion to hold DHHS in civil
contempt of court under the limitations in this Section
A(4)(d), the Court may only hold DHHS in civil contempt
of court if the Court makes a finding of DHHS’s willful
noncompliance with a previous order of enforcement on
the same subject matter. Nothing in this Section A(4)(d)
shall preclude Plaintiffs from seeking attorneys’ fees and
costs on a motion to enforce, whether under 42 U.S.C. §
1988 or otherwise.
e)
For so long as the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions
hereof are in effect, Plaintiffs shall not bring enforcement
actions against DHHS alleging that Plaintiffs’ IPOSs
need to be “costed out” to create an HSW SD CLS and/or
HSW SD OHSS budget, or that a budget created in accordance with Sections C(2) and C(3) is not sufficient to
implement the IPOS.
6
f)
During any time for which DHHS is required by this Settlement Agreement to place the contents of Attachment
C in the Medicaid Provider Manual, any enforcement actions brought by Plaintiffs against DHHS related to “costing out” of an HSW SD CLS and/or HSW SD OHSS
budget, or the sufficiency of such budget to implement the
IPOS, are limited to whether DHHS complied with the
requirements in this Settlement Agreement to place the
contents of Attachment C in the Medicaid Provider Manual. For the avoidance of doubt, Plaintiffs’ forbearance of
enforcement directly against DHHS in this Section
A(4)(f) shall not limit the right of Plaintiffs to seek enforcement of Attachment C, including without limitation
the costing out and sufficiency provisions thereof, against
WCCMH or CMHPSM.
5)
As soon as practicable after execution of this Settlement
Agreement, but no later than 60 days after such execution,
and without regard to any of the Contingencies set forth in
Section D, DHHS shall cause Plaintiffs Derek Waskul, Kevin
7
Wiesner, Cory Schneider, and Hannah Ernst to have available going forward, through their Fiscal Intermediaries, funding for their HSW SD CLS and HSW SD OHSS budgets (including such changes in authorized hours as may be effected
from time to time) at $31 per hour for HSW SD CLS and
$21.70 per hour for HSW SD OHSS.
a)
Such funding shall be revocable only in the circumstances
described in Sections E(2) and E(5) below or if the Court
does not approve this Settlement Agreement, and the
funding shall in any event not be subject to recoupment
on any basis other than for hours not yet expended.
b)
The interim payments shall be treated as made in partial
settlement of disputed claims in this Action and are separate and apart from any other terms of this Settlement
Agreement.
B.
Definitions
1)
The Action: Case No. 2:16-cv-10936-PDB-EAS in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
8
2)
“Amendment,” or “amend,” in the context of amendments to
the contract between DHHS and CMHPSM, includes: (1)
amending an existing contract during a fiscal year to include
the relevant terms, or (2) executing a new contract or contract
renewal in advance of a new fiscal year that includes the relevant terms.
3)
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”): the
agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services that administers the Medicaid program.
4)
“CLS” means the Community Living Supports service.
5)
“CLS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule” refers to
the minimum fee schedule described herein for HSW SD CLS.
6)
“CMHSP” is a Community Mental Health Services Program,
as that term is defined in M.C.L. 330.1100a(18).
7)
The Defendants: DHHS (as defined in the preamble); Community Mental Health Partnership of Southeast Michigan
(“CMHPSM”); and Washtenaw County Community Mental
Health (“WCCMH”).
8)
The Plaintiffs: as set forth in the preamble.
9
9)
The Parties: the Plaintiffs and DHHS. Only the Plaintiffs and
DHHS are parties to this Settlement Agreement.
10)
Habilitation Supports Waiver (“HSW”): the Medicaid program
of home-and-community-based services administered by
DHHS pursuant to Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act,
the terms of which are in a waiver document filed with and
approved by CMS.
a)
The current Habilitation Supports Waiver expires on
September 30, 2024. The terms “Habilitation Supports
Waiver” and “HSW” in this Settlement Agreement encompass any renewals or modifications of the current
waiver in effect before the Sunset Date (as defined in Section E(6)) unless DHHS demonstrates, on a fact-based
motion that shall, as appropriate, be subject to discovery
in aid of its resolution, that such renewal or modification
fundamentally changes the overall concept of Self-Determination CLS services that are the subject matter of the
Action.
10
b)
DHHS represents that, as of the date this Settlement
Agreement is executed, no such fundamental change is
contemplated.
11)
Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans (“PIHPs”): the Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans responsible for managing and paying
claims for HSW services and other services pursuant to a
managed care contract with DHHS. There are 10 Prepaid Inpatient Health Plans: Community Mental Health Partnership
of Southeast Michigan; Detroit Wayne Integrated Health Network; Lakeshore Regional Entity; Macomb County Mental
Health Services; Mid-State Health Network; NorthCare Network; Northern Michigan Regional Entity; Oakland Community Health Network; Region 10 PIHP; and Southwest Michigan Behavioral Health.
12)
HSW Self-Determination Community Living Supports (“HSW
SD CLS”): Community Living Supports covered through and
defined by the Habilitation Supports Waiver document filed
with and approved by CMS and provided via a self-determination arrangement. This term does not include CLS that is
11
not covered through the Habilitation Supports Waiver, nor
does it include CLS covered through the Habilitation Supports Waiver provided via any arrangement other than a selfdetermination arrangement (for example, an agency arrangement).
13)
HSW Self-Determination Overnight Health and Safety Supports (“HSW SD OHSS”). Overnight Health and Safety Supports covered through and defined by the Habilitation Supports Waiver document filed with and approved by CMS and
provided via a self-determination arrangement. This term
does not include OHSS that is not covered through the Habilitation Supports Waiver, nor does it include OHSS covered
through the Habilitation Supports Waiver provided via any
arrangement other than a self-determination arrangement
(for example, an agency arrangement).
14)
“IPOS” means the Individual Plan of Service.
15)
The “Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions” of this Settlement
Agreement are Sections C(2), C(3), C(5), C(6), and C(10) below.
12
16)
“OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule” refers to
the minimum fee schedule described herein for HSW SD
OHSS.
17)
“Policy,” when referring to DHHS, means the Medicaid Provider Manual.
18)
“Self Determination” includes both (1) participant direction of
services as described in Appendix E of the HSW, and (2) “self
direction” as that term is used in DHHS’s Self-Direction Technical Requirements.
C.
Terms
1)
The Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions are subject to the Contingencies described in Section D(1). DHHS is not required to
implement the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions unless and
until all such Contingencies are satisfied.
2)
Subject to the contingencies described in Section D(1), DHHS
shall amend its contract with CMHPSM so that:
a)
For each HSW SD CLS participant, the self-determination budget created jointly by CMHSPM (or a subcontractor to which CMHPSM delegates this function) and the
13
participant pursuant to Appendix E of the HSW shall provide for no less than the amounts set forth in the CLS
Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule (Table 1) below (as adjusted pursuant to Section C(10)) for each authorized unit of HSW SD CLS in the participant’s IPOS.
Table 1
Unit (.25 hour) rate
per participant
$7.75
Service code
H2015
H2015UN (2 participants)
$3.87
H2015UP (3 participants)
$2.59
H2015UQ (4 participants)
$1.94
H2015UR (5 participants)
$1.56
H2015US (6+ participants)
$1.10
This means, for example, that if an IPOS provides that
the HSW SD CLS participant will receive 100 units per
month of one-on-one HSW SD CLS (Service Code H2015,
with a unit being a 15-minute increment), the funding
in the associated budget for that HSW SD CLS must be
equal to or greater than $775/month (100 units x $7.75
minimum rate). For the avoidance of doubt, it is
14
understood and agreed that if an IPOS specifies 2-on-1
(or greater) CLS staffing in certain circumstances, then
the budget shall be calculated, and CMHPSM shall pay,
separately at the 1-on-1 rate for each staffer associated
with the multiple staffing.
b)
CMHPSM shall reimburse to the fiscal intermediary the
amount determined by the approved budget (which shall
be at least the amount determined by the CLS and OHSS
Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules) for HSW
SD CLS and HSW SD OHSS units, respectively, actually
performed during the term of the IPOS. Nothing in this
Section C(2)(b) shall prohibit CMHPSM from advancing
funds to the fiscal intermediary in anticipation of such
actual performance.
3)
Subject to the contingencies in Section D(1), DHHS shall
amend its contract with CMHPSM to require that a minimum
fee schedule (the “OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee
Schedule”) likewise apply to self-directed HSW SD OHSS
15
services, with the table entries for OHSS in effect from time
to time being 70% of those for HSW SD CLS then in effect.
4)
DHHS shall amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to reflect
the content of Attachment A, titled “Costs Included in Community Living Supports Code H2015,” to the extent DHHS
determines that it does not already do so.
5)
Subject to the contingencies in Section D(1), and subject to the
adjustments set forth in Section C(10) below, the CLS and
OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules and the
associated funding for each of them described in Sections C(2),
C(3), and C(6), shall be the totality of the funding provided to
cover all costs for the HSW SD CLS participant’s HSW SD
CLS and HSW SD OHSS (e.g., staff wages, transportation,
employer costs, training, and activity fees).
6)
Subject to the contingencies in Section D(1), DHHS shall increase the actuarially sound capitation rates for CMHPSM to
account for the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum
Fee Schedules.
16
a)
The amount of this capitation rate increase will be at the
sole discretion of DHHS, but it will be subject to CMS’s
annual approval of the amended capitation rates as actuarially sound, as required by federal Medicaid law.
b)
The requirements of this Section C(6) will be deemed satisfied when CMS approves, as actuarially sound, the capitation rates applicable to CMHPSM.
c)
In addition, DHHS shall ensure that the actuary employed by or under contract with DHHS to certify annual
capitation rates also certifies, at least annually, that the
HSW CLS rate cell(s) of DHHS’s capitation matrix for
CMHPSM are not cross-subsidized by any other rate cell
and are “actuarially sound,” as that term is defined in 42
C.F. R. § 438.4.
7)
Subject to the Contingencies described in Section D(2), DHHS
shall amend its contract with CMHPSM to require CMHPSM
to offer new and existing beneficiaries who receive CLS services under the HSW (other than those previously terminated
from self-determination) the choice to self-determine CLS
17
services. To the extent the Contingencies described in Section
D(2) have not been met by September 30, 2025 with respect to
this Section C(7), DHHS shall promptly commence, and diligently pursue to completion, the process of adopting such provision as Policy.
8)
DHHS shall instruct the Michigan Office of Administrative
Hearings and Rules (“MOAHR”) that it is DHHS policy that,
after the participant has exhausted the participant’s internal
appeal to the PIHP/CMHSP consistent with 42 C.F.R. §§
438.402, 438.408(f):
a)
Administrative Law Judges (“ALJs”) in Medicaid Fair
Hearings have the authority in hearings challenging the
CLS and/or OHSS portions of an HSW SD CLS participant’s self-determination budget:
i)
To review HSW SD CLS participants’ assertions that
an insufficient number of units of HSW SD CLS or
HSW SD OHSS was authorized and issue orders, as
specified in Sections C(8)(b) and C(8)(c) below. For
the avoidance of doubt, this includes an assertion by
18
the HSW SD CLS participant regarding the proper
allocation between HSW SD CLS and HSW SD
OHSS, as those services are defined in the Medicaid
Provider Manual; and
ii)
To review the budget attached to an HSW SD CLS
participant’s IPOS and issue orders, as specified in
Sections C(8)(b) and C(8)(c) below.
b)
When reviewing the CLS and/or OHSS portions of an
HSW SD CLS recipient’s self-determination budget, or
the number of units of HSW SD CLS or HSW SD OHSS
that have been authorized, ALJs have authority to issue
an order, if appropriate based on the proofs presented on
the record at the hearing, to:
i)
reverse the determination and require a specific
budget or authorization as described in paragraph
(c)(i) below, or
ii)
reverse the determination and remand to the PIHP/
CMHPSM for further evidence or assessment as described in paragraph (c)(ii) below, or
19
iii) affirm the determination as described in paragraph
(c)(iii) below.
c)
Specifically,
i)
If the ALJ concludes that the proofs presented on the
record at the hearing establish that the PIHP/
CMHSP’s decision with respect to the HSW SD CLS
and/or HSW SD OHSS portions of an HSW SD CLS
participant’s self-determination budget and/or the
number of authorized units of HSW SD CLS or HSW
SD OHSS was inconsistent with medical necessity as
set forth in the Medicaid Provider Manual and that
such proofs establish that a specific budget level or
authorization requested by the participant is: (1)
medically necessary, (2) otherwise consistent with
state and federal law and policy, and (3) necessary to
implement the IPOS, then the ALJ shall reverse the
determination and direct entry of the specific budget
level or number of authorized units of HSW SD CLS
or HSW SD OHSS requested by the participant.
20
ii)
If the ALJ concludes that the proofs presented on the
record at the hearing establish that the PIHP/
CMHSP’s decision with respect to the CLS and/or
OHSS portions of an HSW SD CLS participant’s selfdetermination budget and/or the number of authorized units of HSW SD CLS or HSW SD OHSS was
inconsistent with medical necessity as set forth in
the Medicaid Provider Manual but that such proofs
do not establish that a specific budget level or number of authorized units is (1) medically necessary, (2)
otherwise consistent with state or federal law and
policy, and (3) necessary to implement the IPOS,
then the ALJ shall reverse the determination and remand to the PIHP/CMHSP for reconsideration based
on the ALJ’s findings and order, specifying to the extent reasonably possible the parameters of such reconsideration.
iii) If the ALJ concludes that the proofs presented on the
record at the hearing do not establish that the PIHP/
21
CMHSP’s decision was inconsistent with medical necessity as set forth in the Medicaid Provider Manual
or otherwise inconsistent with state or federal law or
policy, then the ALJ shall uphold the determination.
d)
ALJs in Medicaid Fair Hearings have the authority to review PIHPs’/CMHSPs’ decisions to terminate a self-determination arrangement.
i)
In such a Medicaid Fair Hearing, if the ALJ determines that the evidence presented on the record at
the hearing does not establish that there was good
cause to terminate the self-determination arrangement, then the ALJ will reverse the PIHP/CMHSP’s
decision to terminate the self-determination arrangement and direct the continuation of such arrangement, rather than remand to the PIHP/
CMHSP for reconsideration.
ii)
This Section C(8)(d) shall be implemented as Policy
notwithstanding any provision of existing DHHS
Policy or guidance stating that termination of self22
determination is not the subject of a Medicaid Fair
Hearing.
e)
DHHS shall supply to counsel for Plaintiffs a copy of the
instruction to MOAHR required by this Section C(8).
f)
Notwithstanding such instruction to MOAHR, DHHS
may reserve to itself, as opposed to the ALJ, the final decision as to the authorized budget, the service authorization level, or the termination of self-determination arrangements, provided, however, that the ultimate determination be made within the timeframe for “final administrative action” as set forth in 42 C.F.R. § 431.244(f).
9)
DHHS shall:
a)
Amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to reflect the content of Attachment B, to the extent DHHS determines
that it does not already do so.
b)
Amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to require that
PIHPs (or CMHSPs acting on their behalf) discuss with
the HSW SD CLS participant during the person-centered
planning process various components of CLS, such as
23
transportation, activities, staff wages, employer costs,
training time, and similar topics, as well as, if relevant,
the amount, scope, and frequency of each such component
that may be medically necessary for the participant, as
defined by Attachment B.
c)
Amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to require that
PIHPs (or CMHSPs acting on their behalf) ensure that
the fiscal intermediary does not make a final determination on the amount, scope, or duration of services and
that the PIHP (or its CMHSP subcontractor) does not delegate any aspect of creating the budget to fiscal intermediary personnel.
d)
Amend the Medicaid Provider Manual to require a PIHP
(or a CMHSP acting on a PIHP’s behalf) to notify in writing any HSW SD CLS participant whose self-determination arrangement is at risk of termination that such risk
exists.
i)
The notice shall specify in such detail as is reasonably practicable the issues that have led to the risk of
24
termination, and shall provide opportunities for
meaningful problem solving that involve the HSW
SD CLS participant.
ii)
If, notwithstanding the problem-solving efforts, the
PIHP (or the CMHSP as its subcontractor) believes
that termination is necessary, then it shall issue an
Advance Action Notice, with appeal rights consistent with those provided in 42 C.F.R. § 438.400 et
seq.
e)
Subject to the Contingencies described in Section D(2),
amend the Contract with CMHPSM to add a new sentence to paragraph 1(Q) (General Requirements in Schedule A – Statement of Work) to read: “c. The Contractor
shall comply with any decision issued by an Administrative Law Judge in a Medicaid Fair Hearing.”
f)
Subject to the Contingencies described in Section D(2),
amend the contract with CMHPSM to require that, when
CMHPSM reduces an HSW SD CLS participant’s self-determination budget at an annual renewal or otherwise,
25
CMHPSM provide, in writing, a specific justification for
the reduction, which shall explain why CMHPSM believes the participant does not need the same amount, duration, and scope of HSW services that the participant
was previously assessed to need. To the extent the Contingencies described in Section D(2) have not been met by
September 30, 2025 with respect to this Section C(9)(f),
DHHS shall promptly commence, and diligently pursue
to completion, the process of adopting such provision as
Policy. For the avoidance of doubt:
i)
A budget reduction or termination during the term
of an IPOS shall be treated as a “reduction, suspension, or termination” for purposes of internal appeal
and Fair Hearing rules (including advance Adverse
Benefit Determination notice and continuation of
benefits, when applicable), and
ii)
A budget reduction or termination at annual renewal
shall be treated as a denial of a requested service,
but CMHPSM shall, in the absence of exigent
26
circumstances, provide the written justification required by this Section C(9)(f) as soon as practicable
and, in any event, no later than 14 days before the
PCP meeting for the renewal.
g)
Subject to the Contingencies described in Section D(2),
amend the contract with CMHPSM to require that, when
WCCMH does not approve, or approves a limited authorization of, a request for inclusion in the IPOS of: (i) a service, or (ii) one or more specific aspects of the amount,
scope, or duration of a service, CMHPSM shall ensure
that:
i)
the item is listed in a separate section of the IPOS
titled “Requests Not Approved,” and
ii)
WCCMH provides an adverse benefit determination
that briefly but concretely sets forth its reasoning for
not approving the request.
This Section C(9)(g) shall apply regardless of whether
the non-approval or limited approval takes place during
the person-centered planning process or after its
27
conclusion. To the extent the Contingencies described in
Section D(2) have not been met by September 30, 2025
with respect to this Section C(9)(g), DHHS shall
promptly commence, and diligently pursue to completion, the process of adopting such provision as Policy.
10)
Effective for the rates applicable to SFY 2026 (beginning October 1, 2025) and thereafter, the rates in the CLS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule in each fiscal year, if the
CLS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedule is in effect
as required herein, shall be the rate set forth in Table 1 (the
“Base Rates”) adjusted by the cumulative percentage change
in the nationwide Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage
Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the period beginning March 31, 2024 and ending on the March 31 preceding
the start of the fiscal year in question (that is, the rates for
SFY 2027 shall be the Base Rates adjusted by the percentage
change in the CPI-W from March 31, 2024 to March 31, 2026),
provided, however, that the rates in the CLS Self28
Determination Minimum Fee Schedule in any fiscal year,
shall not be less than the Base Rates set forth in Table 1. For
example:
• If the CPI-W increases by 3 percent from March 31,
2024 to March 31, 2025, the rates applicable for SFY
2026 shall be the Base Rates increased by 3 percent.
• If the CPI-W decreases by 3 percent from March 31,
2024 to March 31, 2025, the rates applicable for SFY
2026 shall be the Base Rates without any adjustment.
• If the CPI-W increases by 5 percent from March 31,
2024 to March 31, 2026, the rates applicable for SFY
2027 shall be the Base Rates increased by 5 percent.
11)
Providing Non-Binding Guidance
a)
DHHS shall provide to PIHPs and CMHSPs non-binding
guidance containing examples illustrating the operation
of the contract and Policy amendments effected hereby
that DHHS, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.
29
b)
If Attachment C takes effect, then no later than 90 days
after it does so, DHHS shall provide to PIHPs and CMHSPs non-binding guidance containing examples illustrating the operation of Attachment C that DHHS, in its sole
discretion, deems appropriate.
c)
DHHS shall consult with counsel for Plaintiffs concerning such non-binding guidance, but the form and content
thereof remain in DHHS’s sole discretion.
D.
Contingencies
1)
DHHS is required to implement the Minimum Fee Schedule
Provisions only if each of the contingencies in Sections D(1)(a)
through D(1)(e) below has been met:
a)
The Michigan legislature appropriates sufficient funds to
pay for capitation rate increases to implement the CLS
and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules
for HSW SD CLS and HSW SD OHSS, respectively, for
all PIHPs statewide. For the avoidance of doubt, this Settlement Agreement only requires DHHS to implement
the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee
30
Schedules for CMHPSM, if the contingencies in Section
D(1) are satisfied, because the Plaintiffs in this Action are
served only by CMHPSM and not by any other PIHPs.
But DHHS has determined it will not implement the CLS
and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules
for CMHPSM unless DHHS is able to implement them
consistently statewide. Accordingly, the Minimum Fee
Schedule Provisions of this Settlement Agreement are
contingent on DHHS securing necessary funding and approvals for statewide implementation.
b)
CMHPSM executes a contract amendment agreeing to
the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions.
c)
CMS approves the contract amendment and capitation
rate increases to account for the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules for all PIHPs
statewide.
d)
CMS approves any amendments to Michigan’s Section
1115 demonstration waivers and Michigan’s Section
1915(c) Habilitation Supports Waiver that CMS deems
31
necessary to implement the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules for all PIHPs
statewide.
e)
CMS issues any other approvals that CMS deems necessary for implementation of the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules for all PIHPs
statewide, including directed payment approval (see 42
C.F.R. § 438.6(c)), if CMS determines that any such approvals are necessary to implement the CLS and OHSS
Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules for all
PIHPs statewide.
2)
DHHS’s requirements to amend its contract with CMHPSM
with respect to the non-Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of
this Settlement Agreement are contingent on CMHPSM signing a contract amendment(s) containing the relevant provisions and CMS approving the contract amendment(s).
3)
DHHS shall request from the Michigan legislature that an appropriation to fund the CLS and OHSS Self-Determination
Minimum Fee Schedules be included in the ongoing and base
32
part of DHHS’s budget, rather than included as a one-time
appropriation.
4)
DHHS will provide Plaintiffs an opportunity to comment on
DHHS’s draft applications to CMS for approval of any applicable state plan amendments, waiver amendments, or statedirected payments required to implement this Settlement
Agreement, and DHHS will consider Plaintiffs’ comments.
E.
Effective Dates; Failure of CLS and OHSS Self-Determination Minimum Fee Schedules to Take Effect; Sunset; Consequences of Failure to Take Effect or Sunset
1)
All provisions of this Settlement Agreement except the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions shall become effective 30 days
after the Court approves this Settlement Agreement, and all
provisions of this Settlement Agreement shall remain in effect
thereafter until the Sunset Date described in Section E(6) below, at which point all provisions of this Settlement Agreement shall no longer be enforceable and the obligations herein
shall cease to exist, except for the provisions of Section G.
a)
It is understood that some of the Terms in this Settlement Agreement (for example, contract amendments and
33
Medicaid Provider Manual modifications) will take
DHHS more than 30 days to complete after Court approval. Accordingly, DHHS will not be deemed in violation of this Settlement Agreement so long as it continues
to make diligent, good faith efforts to finalize what is required to implement these Terms.
2)
On the date 10 calendar days after Director Hertel or her successor certifies to Plaintiffs and the Court that all of the Contingencies in Section D(1) have been met:
(a)
the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of this Settlement Agreement shall become operative, and
(b)
the interim funding for Plaintiffs Derek Waskul, Kevin
Wiesner, Cory Schneider, and Hannah Ernst set forth in
Section A(5) above shall be terminated and shall be supplanted by such Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions.
3)
Recognizing that the interim financial relief hereunder will
not extend to persons other than the four named individual
Plaintiffs, DHHS shall make good faith efforts to satisfy the
Contingencies set forth in Section D(1) as promptly as
34
reasonably practicable given the nature of the Contingencies.
If any such Contingencies set forth in Section D(1) have not
been met within eighteen (18) months of the date of execution
of this Settlement Agreement (the “Drop Dead Date”), and
there has not by that time been express written consent of all
Parties to an extension of the Drop Dead Date, then the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of this Settlement Agreement
shall not come into effect. Notwithstanding this Section E(3),
if the only uncompleted Contingencies as of the Drop Dead
Date are PIHP contract amendments, CMS approvals thereof,
and/or CMS approvals of the new capitated rates, then the
Drop Dead Date shall be deemed extended by six months as
to those uncompleted amendments and approvals only.
4)
If the Minimum Fee Schedule Provisions of this Settlement
Agreement have not come into effect by the date that is 30
days before the Drop Dead Date, DHHS shall at that time
begin, and shall complete by 120 days after the Drop Dead
Date or, if applicable, the extended Drop Dead Date, the process for making amendments to the Medicaid Provider
35
Manual that are necessary to reflect the contents of Attachment C.
5)
Sixty (60) days after the Drop Dead Date, or, if applicable, the
extended Drop Dead Date, the obligation of DHHS to make
the payments to or on behalf of the individual Plaintiffs as
described in Section A(5) above shall expire.
6)
On September 30, 2029 (“Sunset Date”), all provisions of this
Settlement Agreement shall expire, except for Section G.
a)
In anticipation of such expiration, DHHS shall begin no
later than April 1, 2029, and shall complete before June
30, 2029, the process for making amendments to the Medicaid Provider Manual to reflect the content of Attachment C.
b)
Any motion to enforce DHHS’s obligation to promulgate
the amendments described in the foregoing Section
E(6)(a) shall not be subject to the informal consultation
obligations of Section A(4) above and shall be filed before
the Sunset Date. Such motion shall remain within the
36
Court’s jurisdiction, including after the Sunset Date as
described in Section E(6)(c)(i) below.
c)
Upon the Sunset Date, excepting only Section G below
and Section E(6)(b) above, all provisions of this Settlement Agreement shall no longer be enforceable against
DHHS and the obligations of DHHS herein shall cease to
exist.
i)
Upon the later of the Sunset Date or, if a motion is
filed pursuant to Section E(6)(b) above then 90 days
after the entry of a court order that fully adjudicates
such a motion, the Action may, upon motion, be dismissed as against DHHS.
ii)
Such dismissal as against DHHS shall be with prejudice as to any claims accruing prior to the Sunset
Date and without prejudice as to any claims accruing
thereafter.
iii) Upon such dismissal, the Court’s continuing jurisdiction over this Settlement Agreement shall cease.
37
iv) Neither such dismissal, nor the expiration of DHHS’s
obligations under this Settlement Agreement, shall
by itself effect the modification or vacatur of any Policies, guidance, or other actions implemented by
DHHS pursuant hereto, but such Policies, guidance,
or other actions shall upon such expiration and dismissal be subject to ordinary regulatory processes of
amendment, vacatur, or modification.
F.
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
1)
Attorneys’ fees and costs for Plaintiffs’ counsel will be negotiated separate and apart from this Settlement Agreement.
2)
If the Parties cannot agree on attorneys’ fees and costs, Plaintiffs may file a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs, and DHHS
may oppose the motion or the amount of the fees and costs
sought.
3)
Plaintiffs reserve the right to move for attorneys’ fees and
costs for work performed after this Settlement Agreement is
executed, and DHHS reserves the right to oppose such a motion or the amount of the fees and costs sought.
38
G.
Merger of Claims into Settlement Agreement
1)
Thirty-one (31) days after the date the Court approves this
Settlement Agreement (the “Merger Date”), but effective as of
the date of such approval, all claims that Plaintiffs brought or
could have brought against DHHS in this Action shall be extinguished as separate claims and shall merge into this Settlement Agreement.
2)
From and after the Merger Date, Plaintiffs shall have no further recourse against DHHS in respect of such merged and
extinguished claims except pursuant to the terms hereof.
3)
The claims compromised, settled, and resolved by this Settlement Agreement, and merged into and extinguished by this
Settlement Agreement pursuant to paragraph (1) above, include all claims that were raised in the Complaint or
Amended Complaint, and all claims that could have been
raised in the Complaint or Amended Complaint, on behalf of
all Plaintiffs. As of the Merger Date, in consideration of the
commitments contained herein, and the benefits provided or
to be provided hereunder, this Settlement Agreement shall
39
fully resolve, extinguish, and finally and forever bar, and the
Plaintiffs hereby give up, all claims described in this Section
G.
4)
The extinguishment of such claims, and/or their merger into
this Settlement Agreement, shall be limited to DHHS and
shall not preclude claims against any other person or entity,
including without limitation WCCMH and/or CMHPSM.
5)
Nothing herein shall preclude a Plaintiff from asserting in a
Fair Hearing that the authorized CLS units are insufficient
to meet that Plaintiff’s needs.
6)
Nothing herein shall prevent Plaintiffs from continuing to
prosecute the Action against either or both CMHPSM or
WCCMH, and nothing herein shall limit the relief Plaintiffs
may seek against those Defendants.
7)
Nothing herein shall preclude a Plaintiff from asserting
claims against DHHS that accrue after the Sunset Date in a
new lawsuit.
40
H.
Miscellaneous
1)
This Settlement Agreement may not be changed or amended
except by written agreement of the Parties.
2)
By entering into and complying with this Settlement Agreement, no party makes any concession as to the merits of the
case, or of the opposing Party’s claims or defenses.
3)
This Settlement Agreement is a compromise of disputed
claims and is not to be construed as an admission of liability
on the part of DHHS.
Agreed to on this 1st day of December, 2023.
[Signatures follow]
41
/s/ _____________________
Stephanie M. Service (P73305)
Kathleen A. Halloran (P76453)
Bryan W. Beach (P69681)
Attorneys for the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and Elizabeth Hertel, in her
official capacity
Michigan Department of Attorney
General
Health, Education & Family Services Division
P.O. Box 30758
Lansing, MI 48909
(517) 335-7603
ServiceS3@michigan.gov
HalloranK1@michigan.gov
BeachB@michigan.gov
/s/ ________________________
Meghan Hodge-Groen
Senior Deputy Director,
Behavioral and Physical Health
and Aging Services Administration
Michigan Department of Health
and Human Services
333 South Grand Avenue
P.O. Box 30195
Lansing, MI 48909
/s/ _____________________
Edward P. Krugman
NATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW
AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
50 Broadway, Suite 1500
New York, NY 10004-3821
(646) 680-8912
krugman@nclej.org
/s/______________________
Nicholas A. Gable (P79069)
Kyle Williams (P77227)
DISABILITY RIGHTS
MICHIGAN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
4095 Legacy Pkwy
Lansing, MI 48911-4264
(517) 487-1755
ngable@drmich.org
kwilliams@drmich.org
42
ATTACHMENT A:
COMMUNITY LIVING SUPPORTS CODE H2015
Community Living Supports (CLS) are defined as services that “facilitate an individual’s
independence, productivity, and promote community inclusion and participation,” including:
•
Assisting, reminding, observing, guiding or training the participant with: meal
preparation; laundry; routine, seasonal, and heavy household care and
maintenance; Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), such as bathing, eating, dressing,
personal hygiene; and shopping for food and other necessities of daily living.
•
Assisting, supporting, and/or training the participant with: money management;
non-medical care (not requiring nurse or physician intervention); socialization and
relationship building; transportation (excluding to and from medical appointments
that are the responsibility of Medicaid through MDHHS or health plan) from the
participant’s residence to community activities, among community activities, and
from community activities back to the participant’s residence; leisure choice and
participation in regular community activities; attendance at medical
appointments; and acquiring goods and services other than those listed under
shopping.
•
Reminding, observing, and/or monitoring of medication administration.
See Habilitation Supports Waiver.
Whether a service may be covered as CLS depends on whether it is described in the above
definition and is determined through the person-centered planning process to “facilitate an
individual’s independence, productivity, and promote community inclusion and participation,” for
the particular individual. This basic coverage criteria are fleshed out in the “medical necessity
criteria” (see Attachment B), which include services and supports:
•
Necessary for screening and assessing the presence of a mental illness, developmental
disability or substance use disorder; and/or
•
Required to identify and evaluate a mental illness, developmental disability or substance
use disorder; and/or
•
Intended to treat, ameliorate, diminish or stabilize the symptoms of mental illness,
developmental disability or substance use disorder; and/or
•
Expected to arrest or delay the progression of a mental illness, developmental disability,
or substance use disorder; and/or
•
Designed to assist the beneficiary to attain or maintain a sufficient level of functioning
in order to achieve his goals of community inclusion and participation, independence,
recovery, or productivity.
Costs that may be covered for self-determination CLS (and thus are reimbursed through
the CLS unit rate) include, but are not limited to, the following, if they are: (1) not already covered
by another Medicaid service provided to the participant, (2) medically necessary for a particular
CLS participant, as set forth in Attachment B, and (3) related to the participant’s IPOS goals of
facilitating independence and productivity or of promoting community inclusion and participation:
1
•
CLS staff compensation (wages, benefits, payroll taxes) for time spent on any
activities covered by CLS, including CLS staff time spent on delivering CLS
services in the participant’s residence, required training, planning meetings,
supervision, travel with the participant, and attendance at community activities
with the participant.
•
Transportation (i.e., mileage) to and from community activities (not to and from
medical appointments, so long as the transportation costs for those appointments
are covered by the State Plan).
•
Fees and other charges for a community activity for a CLS participant and for the
CLS worker to accompany the participant in the community activity, including,
for example, gym fee, movie ticket, theme park admission, meal at a restaurant,
fee for bowling, fee for horseback riding.
•
Membership fees for organizations that support the identified CLS objectives.
Costs for the following are not covered as CLS under any circumstances:
•
Room and board
•
Fiscal intermediary services
•
Purchase or rental of a vehicle
•
In-home entertainment subscription
•
Any payments to spouses or parents of minor children or to a legal guardian. Note,
however, that payments to a non-guardian parent of an adult, or to a spouse of a
legal guardian, are permitted so long as they are for work actually performed by
that individual.
2
ATTACHMENT B
MEDICAL NECESSITY CRITERIA
This Attachment B is intended to resolve areas where disputes have arisen.
The specific definition of medical necessity and the criteria for determining it are set forth
in the current version (in effect on December 1, 2023) of Section 2.5 of the Behavioral Health and
Intellectual and Developmental Disability Supports and Services chapter of the Medicaid Provider
Manual and include supports, services, and treatments that are:
•
Necessary for screening and assessing the presence of a mental illness,
developmental disability, or substance use disorder; and/or
•
Required to identify and evaluate a mental illness, developmental disability, or
substance use disorder; and/or
•
Intended to treat, ameliorate, diminish, or stabilize the symptoms of mental
illness, developmental disability, or substance use disorder; and/or
•
Expected to arrest or delay the progression of a mental illness, developmental
disability, or substance use disorder; and/or
•
Designed to assist the beneficiary to attain or maintain a sufficient level of
functioning in order to achieve his goals of community inclusion and
participation, independence, recovery, or productivity.
Medical necessity determinations are made in the person-centered planning process by a
combination of assessments by professional(s), with input from the individual and their support
system. Medical necessity determinations are made in terms of amount, scope, and duration. The
determination of whether a given activity is medically necessary, and whether an alternative would
accomplish the same goals, is inherently and always must be a determination specific to the
individual.
If a particular activity, put in the IPOS through the person-centered planning process, meets
the above definition of medical necessity and the definition of CLS in Attachment A, then it is part
of the “scope” of the CLS services. UM will not replace the person-centered planning process. For
example, UM review may not remove or change the participant’s goals. It may provide for less
costly alternatives that accomplish the same goals.
This does not prohibit a supervisor from changing a goal that the case manager agreed to
at the person-centered planning meeting, provided the person-centered planning meeting is reopened.
1
ATTACHMENT C
PERSON-CENTERED PLANNING, COSTING OUT, AND
PREPARING THE IPOS AND THE BUDGET RELATED TO
COMMUNITY LIVING SUPPORTS
Costing Out Procedures
(1)
In accordance with Appendix E of the HSW, both the IPOS and the individual budget are
developed in conjunction with one another through the person-centered planning process.
(a)
The Home and Community Based Services Rule (42 C.F.R. Part 441, Subpart
G), Appendix D-1 of the HSW, Michigan Mental Health Code, and Michigan
Medicaid Provider Manual provisions implementing Appendix D-1 of the
HSW, govern the person-centered-planning process.
(b)
Both the participant and the PIHP/CMHSP must agree, during the person-centered planning process, to the amounts in the individual budget before the
budget is authorized for the participant’s use.
(c)
If the person-centered planning process does not result in an agreed budget, the
PIHP/CMHSP shall set the budget and, pending resolution through any internal
appeal and Fair Hearing that the participant may pursue, the budget shall be set
equal to the immediately preceding budget.
(2)
The IPOS must set forth, in detail and with specificity, the amount, scope, and duration
(see Attachments A and B) of the recipient’s CLS services. The activities and tasks constituting the “scope” of the services, for example, should be set forth in enough detail for their
anticipated individual and cumulative costs to be ascertained.
(3)
The amount of the recipient’s CLS budget is determined by costing out the medically necessary services and supports set forth in the IPOS. Specifically:
(a)
(b)
The staff wage component of the budget shall:
(i)
Consist of staff wages in an amount sufficient to provide the medically necessary services identified in the beneficiary’s IPOS but that
shall not exceed the staff wage necessary to do so, multiplied by the
number of authorized units that staff member is expected to fill; and
(ii)
Include Worker’s Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, and
taxes.
Considerations for determining an appropriate staff wage may include, but are
not limited to, CLS staff wages charged by self-determination providers in the
community for similarly-situated CLS recipients; staff wages for the CLS recipient’s self-determination providers for other services; staff wages the CLS
recipient has previously paid to CLS self-determination staff; staff wages requested by CLS self-determination staff the CLS recipient wishes to hire; staff
wages requested by CLS self-determination staff that have responded to job
advertisements posted by the CLS recipient; and the CLS recipient’s efforts to
locate staff at any given staff wage.
(4)
(c)
The anticipated costs of the activities and tasks determined to be part of the
CLS services’ “scope” (as set forth in Attachments A and B) shall be costed
out separately.
(d)
The recipient’s anticipated transportation costs related to the CLS activities
and tasks in the IPOS are likewise costed out separately, it being understood
that staff transportation cost does not include home-to-workplace or workplace-to-home transportation time or expense for the staff member.
The CLS budget must be sufficient to implement the IPOS.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?