Hanserd v. Woods

Filing 35

ORDER Denying Petitioner's 32 Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARCUS HANSERD, Petitioner, Case No. 16-cv-11099 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. TONY TRIERWEILER, Respondent. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S RULE 60(b) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (ECF No. 32) On March 25, 2016, Petitioner Marcus Hanserd filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (See Pet., ECF No. 1.). By an opinion and order dated October 30, 2018, the Court denied the Petition. (See Op. and Order, ECF No. 22.) In that ruling, the Court failed to discern that Hanserd was raising a claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to exclude a witness’s in-court identification (the “InCourt Identification Ineffective Assistance Claim”). After the Court denied Hanserd’s habeas petition, Hanserd sought a Certificate of Appealability from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. That court granted a limited certificate of appealability on the In-Court Identification Ineffective Assistance Claim. (See Sixth Circuit Order, ECF No. 32, PageID.1262-1266.) 1 With Hanserd’s appeal pending in the Sixth Circuit, he returned to this Court, and on July 1, 2019, he filed a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Rule60(b) Mot., ECF No. 32.) In that motion, Hanserd asks this Court to re-open the proceedings here and to grant relief on his In-Court Identification Ineffective Assistance Claim. (See id.) By order dated February 25, 2020, the Sixth Circuit ruled that the In-Court Ineffective Assistance Claim is time-barred. (See Sixth Circuit Order, ECF No. 33.) That ruling is binding on this Court and precludes this Court from granting Hanserd relief on his current motion. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Hanserd’s motion from relief from judgment (ECF No. 32) in which he seeks relief based upon the In-Court Identification Ineffective Assistance Claim. IT IS SO ORDERED.             s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 23, 2020 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?