Roden v. Floyd et al

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING as UNOPPOSED Plaintiff's 31 Motion Extension of the Discovery Time; granting and 33 Motion to Extend --Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHNATHAN RODEN, Plaintiff v. Case No. 2:16-CV-11208 District Judge Victoria Roberts Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti MICHELLE FLOYD, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING AS UNOPPOSED PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF THE DISCOVERY TIME LIMIT (DE 31 and 33) Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s February 28, 2017 and March 29, 2017 motions for a 30-day extension of the discovery deadline. (DE 31 and 33.) The discovery cut-off is currently set as February 28, 2017. (DE 29.) Defendants have not filed responses opposing either of the instant motions. “A respondent opposing a motion must file a response, including a brief and supporting documents then available.” E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(c)(1). “A response to a nondispositive motion must be filed within 14 days after service of the motion.” E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2)(B). Thus, in the absence of a scheduling order stating otherwise, Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s February 28, 2017 motion would have been due on or before March 15, 2017 and the response to the March 29, 2017 motion would have been due on or before April 13, 2017. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), 6(d). To date, Defendants have not filed a response. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions for an extension of time are GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED. The discovery deadline shall be extended to forty days from the date of this order, or JUNE 15, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2017 s/Anthony P. Patti Anthony P. Patti UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on May 3, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. s/Michael Williams Case Manager for the Honorable Anthony P. Patti 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?