Roden v. Floyd et al
ORDER GRANTING as UNOPPOSED Plaintiff's 31 Motion Extension of the Discovery Time; granting and 33 Motion to Extend --Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 2:16-CV-11208
District Judge Victoria Roberts
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
MICHELLE FLOYD, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING AS UNOPPOSED
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF THE DISCOVERY TIME
LIMIT (DE 31 and 33)
Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s February 28, 2017 and March 29,
2017 motions for a 30-day extension of the discovery deadline. (DE 31 and 33.)
The discovery cut-off is currently set as February 28, 2017. (DE 29.) Defendants
have not filed responses opposing either of the instant motions. “A respondent
opposing a motion must file a response, including a brief and supporting
documents then available.” E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(c)(1). “A response to a
nondispositive motion must be filed within 14 days after service of the motion.”
E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2)(B). Thus, in the absence of a scheduling order stating
otherwise, Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s February 28, 2017 motion would
have been due on or before March 15, 2017 and the response to the March 29,
2017 motion would have been due on or before April 13, 2017. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
6(a), 6(d). To date, Defendants have not filed a response.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions for an extension of time are GRANTED
AS UNOPPOSED. The discovery deadline shall be extended to forty days from
the date of this order, or JUNE 15, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 3, 2017
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on May 3, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?