Brock v. Brennan
Filing
5
ORDER granting plaintiff's request for a voluntary dismissal 4 Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RANDALL BROCK,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 16-CV-11457
HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH
v.
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster
General, U.S. Postal Service,
Defendant.
/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR A VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (DOC. 4)
Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s request that the instant “case [be] dropped or
frozen, due to the fact that [Plaintiff has] not received [a] final decision from the EEOC.”
(Doc. 4). The Court interprets the instant request as a request for a voluntary dismissal
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) or a stay pending exhaustion of Plaintiff’s
administrative remedies.
The Court finds that a stay would be inappropriate. Exhaustion of administrative
remedies is a condition precedent to bringing a Title VII employment-discrimination action,
see McFarland v. Henderson, 307 F.3d 402, 408 (6th Cir. 2002), and Plaintiff states that
he has not yet exhausted his remedies. There appears to be no reason for this Court to
retain jurisdiction of the instant action, as Plaintiff has no other pending claims and has not
yet served Defendant. Plaintiff is, however, entitled to a voluntary dismissal without
prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a).
-1-
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a voluntary dismissal is
GRANTED. The instant action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 2, 2016
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
May 2, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on
Randall Brock, 19783 Appoline, Detroit, MI 48235.
s/Barbara Radke
Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?