Steele & Company v. Idaho Bean & Elevator Company

Filing 27

ORDER (1) Accepting and Adopting the Report and Recommendation Dated January 9, 2017 and (2) Directing Plaintiff to Submit a Proposed Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION STEELE & COMPANY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 16-CV-11586 vs. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH IDAHO BEAN & ELEVATOR COMPANY, Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED JANUARY 9, 2017 and (2) DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT A PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge Morris, issued on January 9, 2017. In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that a default judgment be entered against Defendant. The parties have not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court has reviewed the R&R and concludes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the proper conclusion for the proper reasons. Therefore, the R&R is accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ordered that a default judgment be entered against Defendant. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed default judgment within 14 days of today’s date. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 16, 2017 Detroit, Michigan s/Mark A. Goldsmith MARK A. GOLDSMITH United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 16, 2017. s/Karri Sandusky Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?