Green v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.

Filing 60

ORDER Adopting 58 Report and Recommendation and dismissing case Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES GREEN, Plaintiff, Case No. 16-11587 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge v. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD, INC., Mona K. Majzoub United States Magistrate Judge Defendant. ______________________________/ ORDER: 1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 58); 2) DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 25(A)(1) On June 20, 2018, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 58) recommending that this Court dismiss this action in light of the death of pro se Plaintiff James Green on September 17, 2017. As the Magistrate Judge noted in the Report and Recommendation, on March 20, 2018, Defendant Grand Trunk Western Railroad, Inc. filed a suggestion of death pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 (ECF No. 56), and mailed a copy of the filing to Plaintiff’s last known address, which was the same address as the expected administrator of Plaintiff’s estate. Because no motion to substitute was filed within 90 days of the filing and service of the suggestion of death, the Magistrate Judge recommended that this action be dismissed under Rule 25(a)(1). Having thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby: - ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s June 20, 2018 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 58); and - DISMISSES this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 9, 2018 s/Paul D. Borman Paul D. Borman United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?