Webb v. Social Security
ORDER Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING 15 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Danielle Webb, DENYING 18 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security and REMANDING for Further proceedings Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
CIVIL NO.: 16-CV-11786-DT
HON. ROBERT H. CLELAND
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary
judgment. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. The magistrate judge
issued her report on April 25, 2017 recommending that this court deny defendant’s
motion for summary judgment, grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and
remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. No objections have
been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(C); thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court determines that the findings
and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for
purposes of this order.
The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently
review the motion. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140,149 (1985).
IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED,
plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED
for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 26, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, May 26, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?