Shamsud-Din v. Social Security, Commissioner of
ORDER accepting 21 Report and Recommendation, denying 16 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 18 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
CASE NO. 16-CV-11818
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 21), DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 16), and GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 18)
Plaintiff brought this action challenging defendant Commissioner of
Social Security’s denial of her claim for social security disability benefits.
Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, which
were referred to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. On
July 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Mona Majzoub issued her report,
recommending that defendant’s motion be granted, and plaintiff’s motion be
The magistrate judge specifically stated that any objections to his report
were to be filed within 14 days of service, and that failure to file such
objections constituted a waiver of any further right to appeal. See Thomas v.
Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). No such objections were filed by either party
and the time period for doing so has expired.
The court has reviewed the record and briefing in this matter, as well as
the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and adopts the result
recommended therein. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment
(Doc. 16) is DENIED, defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18) is
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 17, 2017
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
August 17, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?