Synergen Inc. v. FCA US LLC

Filing 94

ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 89 Motion to Enforce Court Order. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SYNERGEN INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 16-cv-11842 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. FCA US LLC, Defendant. _________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE COURT ORDER (ECF #89) On November 3, 2017, Defendant FCA US, LLC filed a motion to enforce a May 12, 2017, order that the Court entered resolving a discovery dispute between the parties. (See ECF #89.) The Court held a hearing on FCA’s motion on March 13, 2018. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that FCA’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:  The Court strikes from Plaintiff’s June 16, 2017, supplemental discovery response the following language found at ECF #89-6, Pg. ID 1970: “Without waiving its original responses … or the supplemental response dated April 24, 2017 and May 24, 2017 which, in addition to the Bates pages identified here 1 included request for quotes and correspondence on the terms of the parties agreement.” The Court does not strike Plaintiff’s objections to the discovery request.  Plaintiff may not amend or supplement its June 16, 2017, supplemental discovery response without leave of Court.  FCA’s motion in all other respects is denied.               s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 13, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on March 13, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?