Gregory v. Colvin
Filing
4
ORDER TO CORRECT DEFICIENCY re 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Sandra R Gregory - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SANDRA R. GREGORY,
No. 16-12572
Plaintiff,
District Judge Matthew F. Leitman
v.
Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
/
ORDER TO CORRECT DEFICIENCY
This is a Social Security Disability case. On July 8, 2016, Plaintiff Sandra R.
Gregory filed a complaint for judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), along with an
application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs [Doc. #2]. In ¶ 3(f) of that
application, Ms. Gregory checked a box indicating that in the past 12 months, she
received income from “other sources.” However, contrary to the instructions contained in
the form, she does not state the source of that income, the amount, or what she expects to
receive in the future. Thus, the Court does not have sufficient information to grant her
request to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs.
Therefore, within 21 days of the date of this Order, Ms. Gregory must file a
supplemental affidavit that fully explains the source, amount, and future expectations
concerning her income from “other sources.” Ms. Gregory’s failure to timely comply with
this Order may result in the denial of her application to proceed without prepayment of
fees or costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/R. Steven Whalen
R. STEVEN WHALEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: July 12, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify on July 12, 2016 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper
with the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered
electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to the following
non-registered ECF participants July 12, 2016.
s/Carolyn M. Ciesla
Case Manager for the
Honorable R. Steven Whalen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?