Quick v. Colvin

Filing 24

ORDER Adopting 23 Report and Recommendation, Granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Brickette A. Quick, Denying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn W. Colvin - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRICKETTE A. QUICK, Plaintiff, Case No. 16-cv-12582 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge v. Patricia T. Morris United States Magistrate Judge COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S APRIL 25, 2017 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 23), (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 18), (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 19), (4) REVERSING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER AND (5) REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) On April 25, 2017, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation to GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, DENY Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMAND this matter for further proceedings under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L. R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23), GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18), DENIES Defendant’s Motion for 1 Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19), REVERSES the findings of the Commissioner and REMANDS the matter for further proceedings under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 11, 2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on May 11, 2017. s/Deborah Tofil Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?