Quick v. Colvin
ORDER Adopting 23 Report and Recommendation, Granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Brickette A. Quick, Denying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn W. Colvin - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
BRICKETTE A. QUICK,
Case No. 16-cv-12582
Paul D. Borman
United States District Judge
Patricia T. Morris
United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S APRIL 25, 2017 REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 23), (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 18), (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 19), (4) REVERSING THE
FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER AND (5) REMANDING FOR FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
On April 25, 2017, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and
Recommendation to GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, DENY Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMAND this matter for further proceedings under
Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation,
and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L. R.
72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23), GRANTS
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18), DENIES Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19), REVERSES the findings of the Commissioner and
REMANDS the matter for further proceedings under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Paul D. Borman
PAUL D. BORMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 11, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney
or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on May 11, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?