Laborers Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity et al v. E and R Masonary Construction Incorporated et al

Filing 16

ORDER STAYING CASE with respect to Defendants Ilices Sanchez, Efrain Sanchez and BMC Masonry, Inc Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND — DETROIT AND VICINITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 16-12583 E AND R MASONRY CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. / ORDER STAYING CASE WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS On October 25, 2016, Defendants Ulices Sanchez, Efrain Sanchez, and BMC Masonry, Inc. filed a notice indicating that each had filed a bankruptcy petition in the preceding month. The court held a telephone status conference to determine the proper course of action in light of the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1), on December 15, 2016. At the conference, counsel agreed that the proceeding be stayed with respect to those Defendants and otherwise continue as scheduled. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the case is STAYED with respect to Defendants Ulices Sanchez, Efrain Sanchez, and BMC Masonry, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party may apply to the bankruptcy court for relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)-(g). IT IS FURTHER ORERED that Defendants Ulices Sanchez, Efrain Sanchez, and BMC Masonry, Inc. are DIRECTED to notify this court upon the close of the automatic stay. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE / Dated: December 16, 2016 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, December 16, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\16-12583.LABRORERS.sever.bankrupt.defendants.tlh.docx 2 /

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?