Laborers Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity et al v. E and R Masonary Construction Incorporated et al
Filing
16
ORDER STAYING CASE with respect to Defendants Ilices Sanchez, Efrain Sanchez and BMC Masonry, Inc Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND —
DETROIT AND VICINITY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 16-12583
E AND R MASONRY CONSTRUCTION
INCORPORATED, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER STAYING CASE WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS
On October 25, 2016, Defendants Ulices Sanchez, Efrain Sanchez, and BMC
Masonry, Inc. filed a notice indicating that each had filed a bankruptcy petition in the
preceding month. The court held a telephone status conference to determine the proper
course of action in light of the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1), on December 15,
2016. At the conference, counsel agreed that the proceeding be stayed with respect to
those Defendants and otherwise continue as scheduled. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the case is STAYED with respect to Defendants Ulices
Sanchez, Efrain Sanchez, and BMC Masonry, Inc.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party may apply to the bankruptcy court for
relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)-(g).
IT IS FURTHER ORERED that Defendants Ulices Sanchez, Efrain Sanchez, and
BMC Masonry, Inc. are DIRECTED to notify this court upon the close of the automatic
stay.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
/
Dated: December 16, 2016
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, December 16, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\16-12583.LABRORERS.sever.bankrupt.defendants.tlh.docx
2
/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?