Big City Small World Bakery Cafe, LLC v. Francis David Corporation
Filing
33
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 28 Report and Recommendation and Denying Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration as Moot. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BIG CITY, SMALL WORLD
BAKERY CAFÉ, LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
No. 16-cv-12652
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
FRANCIS DAVID CORPORATION
d/b/a ELECTRONIC MERCHANT
SYSTEMS,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS OR STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION AS MOOT
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on January 6, 2017
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
United States District Judge
This matter having come before the Court on the November 22, 2016 Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Grand recommending that
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration be denied as
moot; and no timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
having been filed; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,
NOW, THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation of November 22, 2016 [Dkt. # 28] is adopted by the Court.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay
Proceedings Pending Arbitration [Dkt. # 9] is denied as MOOT.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
United States District Judge
Dated: January 6, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or
counsel of record on January 6, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Julie Owens
Case Manager, (313) 234-5135
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?