Serbay v. Dialog Direct, Inc. et al
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALLEGRA'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNT II [Doc. 16]. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)
2:16-cv-12716-AC-EAS Doc # 67 Filed 06/15/17 Pg 1 of 3
Pg ID 1053
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
JENNIFER L. SERBAY, individually
and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Case No. 16-12716
DIALOGDIRECT, INC., a Delaware
corporation and ALLEGRA DIRECT
COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a
HON. AVERN COHN
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALLEGRA’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNT II, (Doc. 16)
This is a wage-hour case. Plaintiff Jennifer Serbay, a customer service
representative (CSR), claims her former employer failed to pay her and other hourly
CSRs for off-the-clock time spent logging in and out of their desktop computers.
Serbay was employed by defendant Allegra Direct Communications, Inc.
(Allegra) and then defendant Dialog Direct, Inc. (Dialog Direct), which acquired Allegra.
The complaint states both a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
regarding unpaid overtime (Count I) and a claim for breach of employment contracts to
the extent CSRs were not paid for all time worked but over minimum wage (Count II).
2:16-cv-12716-AC-EAS Doc # 67 Filed 06/15/17 Pg 2 of 3
Pg ID 1054
On July 29, 2016, Serbay filed a motion for conditional certification of a collective
action under the FLSA with respect to Count I, (Doc. 6).
On September 23, 2016, Allegra filed a motion for partial summary judgment with
respect to Count II, (Doc. 16).
On January 17, 2017, the Court entered a:
Decision Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Conditional Certification of a
Collective Action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, (Doc. 6), and
Staying Proceedings on Count II
(Doc. 43). The Court conditionally certified a collective action as to Count I and stated
“[p]roceedings as to Count II are STAYED until further order of the Court.” (Id. at 4 n.4).
The Court approved plaintiff’s proposed opt-in notices and entered an order as to
collective action procedures. (Doc. 65). The notices are to be mailed to potential
plaintiffs by a claims administrator; signed consent forms are to be filed with the Court.
Because the Court has conditionally certified an FLSA collective action with
respect to Count I (as to Allegra and Dialog Direct), and because the Court has stayed
all proceedings with respect to Count II (as to Allegra and Dialog Direct) until collective
action procedures are completed, the record is not ripe to review Allegra’s motion for
partial summary judgment as to Count II, (Doc. 16). The motion is DENIED without
prejudice to Allegra’s right to re-file the motion once the stay on Count II is lifted.
2:16-cv-12716-AC-EAS Doc # 67 Filed 06/15/17 Pg 3 of 3
Pg ID 1055
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: June 15, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?