J-Bob LLC et al v. Mikes Garage/Larocca Towing
Filing
5
ORDER Requiring Defendant to File Statement Disclosing Citizenship of its Members. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (SBur)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
J-Bob LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No.: 16-12745
Mike’s Garage/Larocca’s Towing, LLC,
Honorable Sean F. Cox
Defendant.
_________________________________________/
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO FILE STATEMENT DISCLOSING
CITIZENSHIP OF ITS MEMBERS
Plaintiffs filed this action on July 25, 2016, asserting subject matter jurisdiction through
diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332.
“[F]ederal courts have an independent obligation to investigate and police the boundaries
of their own jurisdiction.” Douglas v. E.F. Baldwin & Assocs., Inc., 150 F.3d 604, 607 (6th Cir.
1998). Having reviewed Plaintiffs’ complaint, the Court was not persuaded that Plaintiffs have
adequately alleged the necessary facts to establish the existence of diversity jurisdiction.
Under 28 U.S.C. §1332(a), the two requirements for diversity jurisdiction are: 1) that the
matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and
2) that complete diversity of citizenship exists between the disputing parties.
In their Complaint, Plaintiffs did not adequately allege the citizenship of Plaintiff J-Bob
LLC or Defendant Mike’s Garage/Larocca’s Towing, LLC, which are limited liability
companies. For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a “limited liability company is not treated as a
corporation.” Homfeld II, LLC v. Comtair Holdings, Inc., 53 Fed. Appx. 731 (6th Cir. 2002); see
also Delay v. Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC, 585 F.3d 1003 (6th Cir. 2009). Rather, a limited
liability company “has the citizenship of its members.” Id. (emphasis added).
“When diversity jurisdiction is invoked in a case in which a limited liability company is a
party, the court needs to know the citizenship of each member of the company. And because a
member of a limited liability company may itself have multiple members – and thus may itself
have multiple citizenships – the federal court needs to know the citizenship of each ‘submember’ as well.” Delay, supra.
As such, this Court issued a Show Cause Order that required Plaintiffs to identify each
member (and any sub-members) of each LLC that is a party to this case, and identify the
citizenship of each member (and any sub-members). (Docket Entry No. 3).
Plaintiffs responded to the Show Cause Order and adequately set forth the citizenship of
Plaintiff J-Bob LLC. Plaintiffs’ response indicates that Plaintiffs’ Counsel believes that the
Defendant LLC has just two members, but the documents attached do not support that assertion.
Because the identity of the members of the Defendant LLC is not publicly available, in
order to determine if diversity jurisdiction exists in this action, the Court ORDERS that, along
with Defendant’s first responsive pleading, Defendant shall file a short statement,
identifying Defendant’s members and the citizenship of each member.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: August 9, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on
August 9, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Jennifer McCoy
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?