Jacobson v. Macomb County Community College
Filing
14
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MARLENE A. JACOBSON,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 16-cv-12759
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
MACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY
COLLEGE,
Defendant.
__________________________________________________________________/
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIVE ORDER
WHEREAS, parties and non-parties to this action (“Litigation”), have been
or may be requested in the course of discovery or other proceedings to produce or
disclose testimony, documents, or other information (“Discovery Material”) that
they consider private, confidential, or proprietary; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Marlene Jacobson and Defendant Macomb County
Community College have agreed, through their undersigned attorneys, to set forth
procedures for, and rules governing, the use of such Discovery Material;
1.
IT IS ORDERED that all confidential Discovery Material produced,
or depositions taken in discovery in the Litigation, shall be used solely for
purposes of the Litigation and for no other purpose. If, in the course of discovery
or other proceedings in this Litigation, Defendant or Plaintiff, any party to the
216599202.1
Litigation, or any third-party discloses Discovery Material they deem confidential,
or proprietary, the producing party may designate such Discovery Material as
“Confidential.” A party may designate information produced in discovery as
“Confidential” material only if the disclosing party determines, in good faith, that
such material is: (a) personnel information, including performance ratings,
reviews, retirement or separation information, and salary, bonus, benefit and
compensation information, of any current or former employee of Defendant; (b)
medical information concerning any current or former employee of Defendant
and/or their spouses; (iii) information of a proprietary, or confidential business
nature, which is not generally known and which an entity would not normally
reveal to third parties or, if revealed, would require third parties to maintain in
confidence (for example, financial statements and related data; business plans and
agreements, and; other similar information).
2.
Documents are to be designated as “Confidential” by stamping each
page of the document with the corresponding legend. Deposition testimony may
be designated “Confidential” by so indicating orally on the record during the
deposition.
3.
Any person in possession of Confidential Material shall maintain it in
a reasonable and appropriate manner so as to avoid disclosure of its contents in any
manner not permitted by this Order.
2
216599202.1
4.
Confidential Material shall not be disclosed, except as provided in
paragraph 5, except upon prior written consent of the designating party.
5.
Discovery Material that is designated “Confidential” may be disclosed
only to the extent reasonably necessary for the conduct of the Litigation and only
to the following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(e)
(f)
(g)
the Court (including any appellate court) and Court personnel;
court reporters in connection with the taking of a deposition or
the transcription of court proceedings;
attorneys (including in-house and outside counsel) of the parties
to the Litigation (or the corporate parent of a party to the
Litigation) and such attorneys’ employees;
parties to the Litigation and their officers, directors, trustees,
board members, and managerial employees;
the creator and addressees of such Confidential Material and
persons who received a copy thereof (as evidenced on the face
of the Confidential Material or another document) prior to its
production in the Litigation;
anticipated and actual fact witnesses other than the parties to the
Litigation, provided that counsel has a good-faith basis to
disclose such information to such witness;
experts, advisors, consultants, and other persons engaged to
assist directly in the Litigation; and
mediators, facilitators, arbitrators or other third-party neutrals
that are engaged by the parties to the Litigation to participate in
a resolution of the Litigation.
All persons to whom Confidential Material is disclosed in accordance with the
terms of this Order shall be advised by counsel of the terms of this Order and
informed that they are subject to the requirements of this Order prior to disclosure.
3
216599202.1
6.
In the event that counsel for any signatory to this Order at any time
believes that Confidential Material should cease to be so designated, such counsel
shall so notify counsel for the designating party. Counsel for the challenging and
designating parties shall confer in good faith. If agreement is not reached, the nondesignating party shall have the burden of moving and may move upon proper
notice within thirty (30) days to obtain an appropriate order of the Court regarding
the challenged designation. In the event that such a motion is made, it shall be the
burden of the designating party to demonstrate that the Discovery Material
warrants the designation as Confidential. In the event that such a motion is made,
any disputed Discovery Material shall remain subject to and protected by this
Order until such motion is resolved.
7.
This Order does not authorize the filing of any documents under seal.
Documents may be sealed only if authorized by statute, rule, or order of the Court.
A party seeking to file under seal any paper or other matter in any civil case
pursuant to this section shall file and serve a motion or stipulation that sets forth (i)
the authority for sealing; (ii) an identification and description of each item
proposed for sealing; (iii) the reason that sealing each item is necessary; (iv) the
reason that a means other than sealing is not available or unsatisfactory to preserve
the interest advanced by the movant in support of the seal; and, if a party files a
motion only, (v) a memorandum of legal authority supporting the seal. See Local
4
216599202.1
Rule 5.3. No party shall file or otherwise tender to the Clerk any item proposed for
sealing unless the Court has entered an order allowing filing under seal.
8.
Compliance with the terms of the Order shall not be deemed an
admission that any Discovery Material is not otherwise protected from disclosure
or admissible in evidence and shall not constitute a waiver of the right of any
person to object to the production of any Discovery Material for any reason.
9.
This Order shall have no effect upon a designating party's use of its
own Confidential Material.
10.
The inadvertent failure to designate Discovery Material as
Confidential shall be corrected by supplemental written notice to the receiving
party as soon as practicable to prevent further use or disclosure of Confidential
Material contained therein by such persons.
11.
Nothing in this Order shall be deemed in any way to restrict the use of
Discovery Material that is publicly available or has been or could be legally
obtained independent of formal discovery in the Litigation, whether or not the
same material has also been obtained through formal discovery in the Litigation.
12.
Upon request of the designating party, and following the termination
of this action and any related proceedings and appeals, any person in possession of
Confidential Material shall, upon request, either: (1) return such material to
counsel for the designating party; or (2) certify to counsel for the designating party
5
216599202.1
that all such material and copies, summaries, and extracts thereof have been
destroyed, provided, however, that the signatories to this Order and their counsel
may retain copies of attorney work-product and briefs, pleadings, and other papers
filed with or sent to the Court that incorporate, append, or refer to such material,
with such papers remaining subject to the terms and conditions of this Order.
13.
The terms of this Order shall be effective and the parties and their
counsel shall be bound by the terms of this Order on the date the Order is signed by
the parties’ counsel.
14.
Prior to the time this Order is entered by the Court, Confidential
Material shall be subject to the terms of this Order to the same extent as though the
Order has been entered by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: December 11, 2017
6
216599202.1
WE HEREBY STIPULATE TO THE ENTRY OF THE ABOVE ORDER:
BURGESS SHARP & GOLDEN, PLLC
CLARK HILL PLC
s/ Heidi T. Sharp
Heidi T. Sharp (P69641)
43260 Garfield Road, Suite 280
Clinton Township, MI 48038
(586) 226-2627
Attorney for Plaintiff
heidi@bsglawfirm.com
s/ Ellen E. Hoeppner
Ellen E. Hoeppner (P73831)
500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 3500
Detroit, MI 48226
(313) 965-8300
Attorneys for Defendant
ehoeppner@clarkhill.com
7
216599202.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?