Pettit v Carolyn Colvin
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to Supplement her re 4 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Kimberly Pettit.--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-12811
JUDGE DAVID M. LAWSON
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT HER AUGUST 1,
2016 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT
PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS (DE 4)
On August 1, 2016, Kimberly Pettit filed a complaint (DE 1) for judicial
review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s July 1, 2016 decision. On the
same day, she also filed an application to proceed in district court without prepaying
fees or costs (DE 4) and a request for service by the U.S. Marshal (DE 5).
This case has been referred to the undersigned. (DE 3.) Having reviewed
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (DE 4), the Court concludes that
it is not in a position to rule at this time. Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s application
(DE 4) is HELD IN ABEYANCE. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order,
Plaintiff SHALL file a supplemental application which explains the source of
funding by which Plaintiff meets her obligations listed in Questions 6 and 7 of the
applciation, preferably with the assistance of her counsel, Wesley James Lamey
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 3, 2016
s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on August 3, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?