Musser v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
20
ORDER (1) Accepting and Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge Dated January 5, 2017 (Dkt. 19 ) and (2) Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice for Failure to Prosecute. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Sandusky, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
AMBER ROSE MUSSER,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.
16-CV-12919
vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER
(1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED JANUARY 5, 2017 (Dkt. 19) and (2)
DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R)
of Magistrate Judge Stafford, issued on January 5, 2017. In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge
recommends that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
The parties have not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court has reviewed the R&R and concludes that the Magistrate Judge
has reached the proper conclusion for the proper reasons. Therefore, the R&R is accepted and
adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s complaint is
dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 15, 2017
Detroit, Michigan
s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and
any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class
U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 15, 2017.
s/Karri Sandusky
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?