Campbell v. Mack et al

Filing 90

ORDER Granting Defendants' 89 Motion to Stay Pending Appeal. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KEVIN CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-12922 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman DANIEL MACK et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL (ECF #89) On September 12, 2018, this Court issued an Opinion and Order in which it granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (See Opinion and Order, ECF #85.) Defendant Daniel Mack has filed an interlocutory appeal of that decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. (See Notice of Appeal, ECF #87.) Defendants now ask the Court to stay this action pending the resolution of Mack’s appeal. (See Mot. to Stay, ECF #89.) Counsel for Plaintiff Kevin Campbell has informed the Court that Campbell does not oppose Defendants’ request, and the Court concludes that a stay is appropriate while Mack’s appeal is pending. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to stay (ECF #89) is GRANTED and this action shall be STAYED until further order of this Court. The parties are further directed to contact the Court’s case manager as soon as the Sixth Circuit issues a ruling on Mack’s appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED.             s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 11, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on October 11, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?