Campbell v. Mack et al
Filing
90
ORDER Granting Defendants' 89 Motion to Stay Pending Appeal. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KEVIN CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-cv-12922
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
DANIEL MACK et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO STAY PENDING APPEAL (ECF #89)
On September 12, 2018, this Court issued an Opinion and Order in which it
granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (See
Opinion and Order, ECF #85.) Defendant Daniel Mack has filed an interlocutory
appeal of that decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
(See Notice of Appeal, ECF #87.)
Defendants now ask the Court to stay this action pending the resolution of
Mack’s appeal. (See Mot. to Stay, ECF #89.) Counsel for Plaintiff Kevin Campbell
has informed the Court that Campbell does not oppose Defendants’ request, and the
Court concludes that a stay is appropriate while Mack’s appeal is pending.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to stay
(ECF #89) is GRANTED and this action shall be STAYED until further order of
this Court. The parties are further directed to contact the Court’s case manager as
soon as the Sixth Circuit issues a ruling on Mack’s appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 11, 2018
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on October 11, 2018, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(810) 341-9764
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?