Cheney v. COLVIN

Filing 24

ORDER Adopting 23 Report and Recommendation; Denying Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; and Granting Defendant's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment.. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER CHENEY, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:16-cv-12950 v. HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, MAGISTRATE PATRICIA T. MORRIS Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [23], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [18], AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [21] The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("SSA") denied Christopher Cheney's application for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits in a decision issued by an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"). The SSA Appeals Council declined to review the ruling, and Cheney appealed. The Court referred the matter to the magistrate judge and the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") suggesting the Court deny Cheney's motion and grant the Commissioner’s motion. Civil Rule 72(b) governs review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. De novo review of the magistrate judge’s findings is only required if the parties "serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Because neither party filed timely objections, de novo review of the Report's conclusions is not required. Having examined the record, the Court finds that the magistrate judge's conclusions are factually based and legally sound. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation [23] is ADOPTED, Cheney's Motion for Summary Judgment [18] is DENIED, the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [21] is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. s/Stephen J. Murphy, III STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III United States District Judge Dated: May 30, 2017 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on May 30, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/David P. Parker Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?