Green v. National Credit Adjusters, L.L.C.

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO. 16-CV-13028 HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH KUMARI GREEN, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CREDIT ADJUSTERS, LLC, Defendant. ________________________/ ORDER OF DISMISSAL This case arises under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., based on defendant National Credit Adjusters LLC’s attempt to collect on a $1,390 debt plaintiff Kumari Green denies he owes to Kay Jewelers. On January 17, 2017, the court granted plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw based on a break-down in the attorney-client relationship. The court ordered plaintiff to retain new counsel or inform this court of his intention to proceed pro se on or before March 3, 2017. To date, plaintiff has failed to advise the court of his intentions. On April 3, 2017, defendant filed an unopposed motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline based, in part, on plaintiff’s failure to advise the court of his intentions to proceed with or without counsel. -1  The court granted the motion, extended the dispositive motion deadline, and scheduled the joint final pretrial conference for September 25, 2017. To date, plaintiff has not advised the court of his intentions to proceed pro se or through counsel. Moreover, plaintiff failed to file the joint final pretrial order which was due on September 18, 2017. Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 21, 2017 s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on September 21, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on Kumari Green, 20522 Lochmoor Street, Harper Woods, MI 48225. s/Barbara Radke Deputy Clerk -2 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?