jones v. EquityExperts.Org, LLC
Filing
21
ORDER denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 13 and DISMISSING CASE Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
LEAH JONES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 16-CV-13064
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
MAG. JUDGE ELIZABETH STAFFORD
EQUITYEXPERTS.ORG, LLC,
A Michigan Limited Liability Company,
Defendant.
_____________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT [DOC. 13]
Plaintiff Leah Jones filed this action under the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., the Michigan
Occupational Code (“MOC”), M.C.L. §339.915 et seq., and the Michigan
Regulation of Collection Practices Act (“MRCPA”), M.C.L. §445.252 et seq.
Plaintiff asserts claims under the FDCPA alleging that defendant Equity
Experts misrepresented that she has a legal obligation to pay a debt and
deceptively failed to advise plaintiff that partial payment of this debt would
revive an expired statute of limitations.
The matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment. The court held oral argument on the motion on December 20,
-1-
2017. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment is DENIED and plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED.
Plaintiff’s lawsuit arises from defendant’s attempt to collect on a
$334.55 debt that plaintiff owed to Highlands Estates Condominium
Association for unpaid association fees regarding a home lost to
foreclosure in 2009. Plaintiff’s last payment made toward the debt was on
July 9, 2008. Following plaintiff’s default on her home, the Association
assigned all of its right, title and interest in any unpaid sums owed by
plaintiff to defendant. Defendant subsequently sent a collection letter to
plaintiff on February 17, 2016 in an effort to collect the debt.
Plaintiff claims that this debt became legally unenforceable after July
9, 2014 because the six year statute of limitations had expired. M.C.L.
§600.5807(8). Plaintiff asserts that M.C.L. §600.5807(8), which governs
recovery of damages or sums due for breach of contract, is the correct
statute of limitations to apply because she characterizes the debt as arising
from a contractual duty under the Association bylaws.
Defendant conversely contends that the debt falls under M.C.L.
§600.5807(4), covering actions founded upon covenants in deeds and
mortgages of real estate, and is thus subject to a ten year statute of
-2-
limitations. The court finds that the statute of limitations in M.C.L.
§600.5807(4) applies to this case because the debt arises from a covenant
in the master deed and the corresponding bylaws which are expressly
incorporated into the master deed. Under the ten year statute of limitations,
plaintiff’s debt is not time-barred.
At oral argument, plaintiff’s counsel conceded that if the ten year
statute of limitations is found to apply to plaintiff’s claims, then plaintiff’s
complaint fails to state a cause of action. There was no argument on the
state court counts asserted by plaintiff in her complaint. In its response to
plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, defendants request that the court
dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety and enter judgment in favor of
defendant.
For the reasons set forth above, the court denies plaintiff’s motion for
summary judgment and dismisses plaintiff’s FDCPA claim. The court
declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state law
claims. See Musson Theatrical, Inc. v. Fed. Express Corp., 89 F.3d 1244,
1254-55 (6th Cir. 1996). Now, therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment is DENIED.
-3-
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the court declines to
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s remaining state claims.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint is
DISMISSED in its entirety.
Dated: January 3, 2018
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
January 3, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Marcia Beauchemin
Deputy Clerk
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?